Dorrell R. Coulthurst v. United States
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11966, 214 F.3d 106 (2000)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The Discretionary Function Exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act does not shield the government from liability for employee negligence when the challenged conduct is not grounded in considerations of public policy, even if the conduct involves an element of judgment or choice.
Facts:
- Dorrell R. Coulthurst was an inmate at the Federal Corrections Institute in Danbury, Connecticut.
- On October 9, 1992, Coulthurst was using a lateral pulldown machine in the prison gymnasium.
- The cable on the machine snapped, causing a bar with approximately 270 pounds of force to strike his shoulders, neck, and back.
- Coulthurst suffered a torn rotator cuff and other injuries as a result of the incident.
- Bureau of Prisons guidelines required officials to determine if exercise equipment was arranged in a safe manner but did not specify the method or frequency of inspections.
- An inspection log indicated that an inspection of the exercise room had been conducted two days prior to Coulthurst's injury.
Procedural Posture:
- Dorrell R. Coulthurst sued the United States in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
- The United States filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, asserting sovereign immunity under the discretionary function exception.
- The district court granted the government's motion to dismiss.
- Coulthurst (appellant) appealed the dismissal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, where the United States was the appellee.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the discretionary function exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act bar a suit against the government for its employee's alleged negligent failure to inspect and maintain prison equipment, when the negligence may have resulted from ordinary carelessness rather than a policy-based decision?
Opinions:
Majority - Leval, Judge
No. The discretionary function exception does not bar the suit because the alleged negligence may not have been based on a public policy judgment. The court applied the two-pronged Berkovitz-Gaubert test, which requires that for the exception to apply, the conduct must (1) be discretionary, involving an element of judgment or choice, and (2) the judgment must be grounded in considerations of public policy. The district court correctly noted that decisions about the frequency and procedures for inspection are policy-based and fall within the exception. However, the complaint is broad enough to also allege ordinary, operational negligence, such as an inspector who, out of laziness or inattentiveness, failed to perform the inspection properly, failed to notice the frayed cable, or failed to report the damage. Such negligence is not grounded in social, economic, or political policy and therefore falls outside the scope of the discretionary function exception. Because the complaint encompasses conduct that, if proven, is not shielded by the exception, dismissal at the pleading stage was improper.
Analysis:
This case clarifies the application of the second prong of the discretionary function exception test, emphasizing the distinction between policy-level decisions and operational-level negligence. It establishes that not all discretionary acts by government employees are protected; the government remains liable for 'garden-variety' negligence that occurs during the implementation of a policy. This decision prevents the government from using the exception as a blanket shield for any employee mistake that involves a choice, thereby preserving a path for tort claims based on ordinary carelessness and forcing courts to analyze the nature of the specific negligent act rather than just the general context in which it occurred.

Unlock the full brief for Dorrell R. Coulthurst v. United States