Doe v. United Services Life Insurance
1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14036, 123 F.R.D. 437, 1988 WL 141435 (1988)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A plaintiff may be permitted to proceed with a lawsuit under a pseudonym when a substantial privacy interest in a highly sensitive and personal matter outweighs the customary public interest in open judicial proceedings, particularly where the litigation may cause the plaintiff to be associated with a stigmatized group.
Facts:
- John Doe, a law clerk for a federal judge, and his father applied for a life insurance policy on Doe's life with United Services Life Insurance Company.
- As part of the application process, a United Services representative interviewed Doe and required him to undergo a physical examination and blood test.
- Doe alleged that United Services profiled him as homosexual because he was a single male living with another male in Greenwich Village and required the extra steps for this reason.
- Following the blood test, which revealed high levels of liver enzymes, United Services offered Doe a policy but with a higher premium, attributing the surcharge to a health risk associated with alcohol abuse.
- Doe, who states he is heterosexual, alleged the surcharge was discriminatory.
- After being informed of the abnormal blood test, Doe offered to retake it, but United Services declined.
- Doe subsequently underwent an independent blood test, which yielded normal results.
Procedural Posture:
- John Doe filed a complaint against United Services Life Insurance Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, a state trial court.
- The state court granted Doe an ex parte order authorizing him to serve the initial pleadings under a pseudonym.
- Doe filed a motion in state court seeking leave to prosecute the entire action pseudonymously.
- Before the state court ruled on the motion, United Services removed the action to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
- In federal court, United Services filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to identify the plaintiff as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10(a).
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a plaintiff who alleges discrimination based on a defendant's perception of him as homosexual have a sufficient privacy interest to proceed with a lawsuit under a pseudonym, even when the plaintiff claims he is heterosexual?
Opinions:
Majority - Sweet, J.
Yes. A plaintiff may proceed under a pseudonym in a discrimination case based on perceived homosexuality to protect substantial privacy interests. The court balances the plaintiff's privacy concerns against the public's interest in open proceedings. Here, despite the plaintiff's assertion that he is heterosexual, the nature of his claim—that he was discriminated against because he was perceived as homosexual—creates a significant risk that he will be publicly identified as homosexual. This risk is heightened by the social stigma associated with homosexuality and the AIDS crisis at the time. This substantial privacy interest outweighs the public's interest, especially since the defendant already knows the plaintiff's identity and is not prejudiced in its ability to conduct discovery and defend the action.
Analysis:
This decision exemplifies the judicial balancing test between the strong presumption of public access to court proceedings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10(a) and an individual's right to privacy in sensitive matters. It establishes that a plaintiff's privacy interest can be triggered by the perception of belonging to a stigmatized group, not just actual membership. The ruling broadens the scope of pseudonym protection, recognizing that the subject matter of the litigation itself can create a risk of social stigma sufficient to overcome the general rule of party identification, thereby influencing how future cases involving sensitive personal characteristics are handled.
