Dobrin v. Stebbins
1970 Ill. App. LEXIS 1387, 259 N.E. 2d 405, 122 Ill. App. 2d 387 (1970)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An individual who enters private property using a provided walkway to the front door for a lawful purpose, such as soliciting sales, is considered a licensee and not a trespasser. Therefore, they are in a place where they 'may lawfully be' under the Illinois dog bite statute, making the property owner strictly liable for injuries caused by their dog, absent provocation.
Facts:
- On July 16, 1964, defendant Dobrin owned a toy German Shepherd.
- Dobrin chained the dog to a pipe, confining it to his property.
- The property had a dirt path leading from the public sidewalk to the front door, with no signs or notices warning people to stay away.
- Plaintiff Mroczynski, a 17-year-old magazine salesman, walked up the path toward Dobrin's home.
- When Mroczynski was within five to ten feet of the door, the dog, which had been concealed by bushes, jumped out and bit him on the abdomen and thigh.
- Mroczynski did not see the dog before it attacked him.
- Mroczynski sought medical treatment for his injuries, which were painful for three to four days.
Procedural Posture:
- Plaintiff Mroczynski filed a personal injury lawsuit against defendant Dobrin in an Illinois trial court.
- Following a non-jury trial (bench trial), the trial judge entered a judgment in favor of Mroczynski and awarded him $750 in damages.
- Defendant Dobrin, as the appellant, appealed the trial court's judgment to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Mroczynski is the appellee.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a person who enters private property to solicit sales, where no warnings are posted, qualify as someone in a place where they 'may lawfully be' under the Illinois dog bite statute, thus holding the owner liable for injuries caused by their dog?
Opinions:
Majority - Justice Leighton
Yes. A person who enters private property for a lawful business purpose using a walkway provided by the owner is a licensee, not a trespasser, and is therefore in a 'place where he may lawfully be' under the dog bite statute. The court reasoned that an owner who provides a path to their door without any warning signs extends an implied license for the public to use it for lawful purposes during ordinary hours. Because Mroczynski was a licensee, he met the statutory requirement of being in a place he could 'lawfully be.' To recover under the statute, the plaintiff only needed to prove he was peaceably conducting himself, was on the property lawfully, and was injured by the defendant's dog without provocation. In a supplemental opinion denying a rehearing, the court rejected the defendant's argument that a chained dog serves as a warning, because in this case, the dog was hidden by bushes and not visible to the plaintiff.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the scope of landowner liability under the Illinois strict liability dog bite statute by defining the legal status of individuals like door-to-door salespeople. It establishes that such individuals are licensees, not trespassers, affording them greater protection and simplifying their path to recovery. The ruling solidifies the principle that an implied invitation exists for lawful entry where a homeowner provides a walkway and no explicit warnings. This precedent impacts future cases by placing a clear burden on dog owners to control their animals, even on their own property, with respect to those who enter for conventional and lawful purposes.
