Delgado v. Laundromax, Inc.
2011 WL 2496658, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8958, 65 So. 3d 1087 (2011)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
In a premises liability negligence claim, a plaintiff must produce evidence that the business owner had actual or constructive notice of the transitory foreign substance that caused the fall to survive a motion for summary judgment. The mere presence of a substance on the floor and the fact of a fall are insufficient, by themselves, to establish a breach of duty.
Facts:
- On August 21, 2003, Justa Patricia Delgado entered a laundromat owned by Laundromax, Inc.
- Upon walking a few steps through the doorway, Delgado slipped on a clear liquid on the floor, which she believed to be water.
- As a result of slipping, she fell backward and hit her head on the doorknob, sustaining injuries.
- Delgado did not know where the water came from, how long it had been on the floor, or if any Laundromax employee was aware of its presence before her fall.
- There was no evidence of recent rain or of any nearby equipment that might have leaked.
- Delgado testified in a deposition that the Laundromax facility was 'always clean.'
Procedural Posture:
- Justa Patricia Delgado filed a negligence lawsuit against Laundromax, Inc. in a Florida trial court.
- Laundromax moved for summary judgment, arguing there was no evidence it breached its duty of care because it lacked actual or constructive notice of the liquid on the floor.
- The trial court granted final summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Laundromax.
- Delgado, as the appellant, appealed the summary judgment order to the Florida Third District Court of Appeal; Laundromax is the appellee.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the mere presence of a clear liquid on a business's floor, without evidence of how long it was there or that the business had knowledge of it, create a genuine issue of material fact regarding the business's breach of duty sufficient to overcome a motion for summary judgment?
Opinions:
Majority - Rothenberg, J.
No. The mere presence of a clear liquid on a business's floor, without additional evidence, is insufficient to create a triable issue of fact regarding a breach of duty. Under Florida law, for a plaintiff in a slip-and-fall case to prevail against a business owner, they must show the owner breached its duty of reasonable care. To establish a breach, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving the owner had either actual or constructive notice of the hazardous condition. Actual notice requires evidence that the owner knew about the specific spill. Constructive notice can be inferred from evidence that the substance was on the floor for a sufficient length of time for the owner to have discovered it, or that the condition occurred with such frequency that the owner should have known of its existence. In this case, Delgado presented no evidence to support either theory. She only established that there was water on the floor and that she fell. Because there were no facts, such as tracks, dirt, or partial drying, to suggest the water had been there for a long time, and her own testimony that the premises were 'always clean' negated any claim of a negligent mode of operation, no genuine issue of material fact existed, and summary judgment for Laundromax was appropriate.
Analysis:
This case clarifies the evidentiary burden on plaintiffs in Florida slip-and-fall negligence cases to survive summary judgment. It reinforces the principle that the occurrence of an accident does not create an inference of negligence. By affirming summary judgment, the court underscores that a plaintiff must proffer specific facts—beyond the fall itself—that would allow a jury to reasonably infer the business owner had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition. This decision makes it more difficult for plaintiffs to proceed to trial without concrete evidence of the business's fault, thereby strengthening the summary judgment standard as a screening mechanism in premises liability litigation.
Unlock the full brief for Delgado v. Laundromax, Inc.