Lexplug logoLexplug

Davidow v. Inwood North Professional Group-Phase I

Supreme Court of Texas
747 S.W.2d 373 (1988)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

In a commercial lease, there is an implied warranty of suitability from the landlord that the premises are suitable for their intended commercial purpose. The tenant's obligation to pay rent is dependent upon the landlord's compliance with this warranty.


Facts:

  • Dr. Joseph Davidow entered into a five-year lease with Inwood North Professional Group — Phase I for medical office space.
  • The lease obligated Inwood to provide essential services, including air conditioning, electricity, hot water, and janitorial services.
  • Shortly after occupying the space, Dr. Davidow experienced persistent problems, including a non-working air conditioner causing temperatures to exceed eighty-five degrees.
  • The roof leaked during rain, resulting in stained tiles, rotting carpet, and water dripping on patients in the waiting room.
  • The office was frequently infested with pests and rodents, hallways were unlit for months, and cleaning services were not provided.
  • On one occasion, the office lost electricity for several days because Inwood failed to pay the utility bill, and hot water was not provided.
  • After enduring these conditions, Dr. Davidow vacated the premises and ceased paying rent approximately fourteen months before the lease was set to expire.

Procedural Posture:

  • Inwood North Professional Group — Phase I sued Dr. Joseph Davidow in a Texas trial court for unpaid rent.
  • Dr. Davidow asserted affirmative defenses, including breach of an implied warranty that the premises were suitable for a medical office.
  • A jury found that Inwood materially breached the lease and that the space was not suitable for a medical office.
  • The trial court entered a take-nothing judgment against Inwood and awarded damages to Dr. Davidow.
  • Inwood, as appellant, appealed to the Texas court of appeals.
  • The court of appeals reversed the trial court, holding that the covenants to repair and to pay rent were independent, and rendered judgment for Inwood for the unpaid rent.
  • Dr. Davidow, as petitioner, appealed to the Supreme Court of Texas.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a commercial landlord make an implied warranty that the leased premises are suitable for their intended commercial purpose, the breach of which justifies the tenant's nonpayment of rent?


Opinions:

Majority - Justice Spears

Yes. A commercial landlord makes an implied warranty that the premises are suitable for their intended commercial purpose, and this warranty is mutually dependent on the tenant's obligation to pay rent. The court rejected the old common law rule that lease covenants are independent, which previously required a tenant to pay rent regardless of the landlord's breaches. Citing its prior reasoning in extending an implied warranty of habitability to residential leases in Kamarath v. Bennett, the court found no valid reason to distinguish between residential and commercial tenants. Both types of tenants rely on the landlord's expertise and ability to maintain the property, and the primary subject of a modern lease is a usable structure, not just the land. Because Inwood's failures rendered the space unsuitable for a medical office, it breached the implied warranty of suitability, justifying Dr. Davidow's decision to abandon the property and stop paying rent.



Analysis:

This decision marks a significant departure from traditional property law in Texas by extending tenant-protective warranties into the commercial leasing context. It rejects the archaic common law doctrine of independent covenants and caveat emptor for commercial leases, aligning them with modern contract principles where obligations are mutually dependent. This case establishes a new, crucial defense for commercial tenants (breach of implied warranty of suitability) and imposes a higher duty on commercial landlords to maintain the functional and physical integrity of their properties. Future litigation in this area will likely focus on the specific factors constituting a breach and whether parties can validly waive this implied warranty through express lease provisions.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Davidow v. Inwood North Professional Group-Phase I (1988) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for Davidow v. Inwood North Professional Group-Phase I