Dampier v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Texas
2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 4283, 2016 WL 1658772, 493 S.W.3d 118 (2016)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

The equitable doctrine of adoption by estoppel, which permits an individual to inherit from an intestate decedent as if formally adopted, applies only when the agreement to adopt was made while the individual was a minor and does not extend to adults.


Facts:

  • Tracy Dampier met Donald Williams when Dampier was 19 years old.
  • Donald, who was about 30 years older than Tracy, orally promised to adopt him.
  • For approximately 30 years, the two maintained a close relationship, referred to each other as 'father' and 'son,' and Donald introduced Tracy as his son to others.
  • After knowing each other for over 20 years, Donald moved in with Tracy, who cared for him for four years until his death.
  • Donald signed legal documents appointing Tracy as his agent under a general power of attorney and medical power of attorney.
  • Despite the promise and their long relationship, Donald never took any formal legal steps to adopt Tracy.
  • Donald died intestate, meaning without a will.

Procedural Posture:

  • After Donald Williams died intestate, Tracy Dampier filed an application for determination of heirship in a Texas probate court.
  • Cheryl Williams Yearnd and Heidi Williams, Donald's niece and grand-niece, filed a traditional motion for summary judgment, arguing that adoption by estoppel does not apply to adults.
  • The probate court (trial court) granted the motion for summary judgment in favor of Yearnd and Williams.
  • Tracy Dampier (appellant) appealed the trial court’s judgment to the Texas Court of Appeals, First District (intermediate appellate court), with Yearnd and Williams as appellees.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does the equitable doctrine of adoption by estoppel apply to an individual who was an adult at the time of the alleged oral agreement to adopt, thereby granting them inheritance rights from an intestate decedent?


Opinions:

Majority - Harvey Brown, Justice

No, the equitable doctrine of adoption by estoppel does not apply to an individual who was an adult at the time of the alleged agreement to adopt. The doctrine is a judicially-created, equitable remedy that is applied with caution specifically to prevent injustice to a minor child who, having no will or choice in the matter, performs services and renders affection based on a promise of adoption. Unlike a minor, an adult is capable of contracting for themselves and has other legal remedies to secure inheritance rights, such as ensuring the creation of a will or a formal statutory adoption. The court reasoned that extending the doctrine to adults would 'open the door to many fraudulent claims' and is unnecessary given the availability of clear statutory procedures for adult adoption and estate planning. The court distinguished this equitable doctrine from statutory adoption, noting that provisions in the Texas Family Code treating statutory adult and minor adoptions equally do not control the confines of the non-statutory, judicially-created doctrine of adoption by estoppel.



Analysis:

This decision solidifies the boundary of the doctrine of adoption by estoppel in Texas, explicitly limiting its application to situations where the adoptee was a minor. The court's refusal to extend this equitable remedy to adults underscores a judicial preference for formal legal processes over informal agreements, particularly where adults are concerned. The ruling signals that adults seeking to establish inheritance rights outside of biological ties must use statutory adoption procedures or testamentary instruments like a will, as courts are unwilling to use equity to remedy the failure to do so. This case serves as a clear precedent against claims of equitable adoption by adults, thereby providing certainty in probate matters and discouraging potential fraudulent claims based on informal relationships with decedents.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Dampier v. Williams (2016) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.