Dade County Classroom Teachers Association, Inc. v. Legislature
269 So. 2d 684, 81 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2899 (1972)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
While the judiciary cannot compel the legislature to exercise a purely legislative function due to the separation of powers, courts have the ultimate responsibility to enforce constitutional rights and may fashion judicial remedies if the legislature fails to implement those rights within a reasonable time.
Facts:
- The 1968 Florida Constitution, in Section 6, Article I, grants public employees the right to collectively bargain but prohibits them from striking.
- In a prior case, Dade County Classroom Teachers' Association v. Ryan (1969), the Florida Supreme Court affirmed this right and urged the Legislature to enact standards and guidelines for public employee labor relations.
- In the three legislative sessions following the Ryan decision, the Florida Legislature did not enact comprehensive legislation establishing such standards and guidelines for all public employees.
- The Legislature did, however, pass a law in 1972 (Chpt. 72-275) setting collective bargaining standards specifically for firefighters.
- The Dade County Classroom Teachers' Association, representing 7,500 teachers, sought to exercise their constitutional right to collective bargaining but were hindered by the lack of a legislative framework.
Procedural Posture:
- The Dade County Classroom Teachers' Association, Inc., as petitioner, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus directly in the Supreme Court of Florida.
- The action was filed as a class action on behalf of all public employees of the state of Florida.
- The respondent in the action was the Legislature of the State of Florida.
- The petition sought an order from the court compelling the Legislature to enact standards and guidelines for public employee collective bargaining.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the judiciary have the power, under the doctrine of separation of powers, to issue a writ of mandamus compelling the state legislature to enact legislation that provides standards and guidelines for a constitutionally guaranteed right?
Opinions:
Majority - Roberts, Chief Justice
No. The judiciary cannot compel the Legislature to exercise a purely legislative prerogative. The doctrine of separation of powers, as mandated by the Florida Constitution, prohibits one branch of government from exercising powers that appertain to another. However, this doctrine has exceptions, particularly concerning constitutionally guaranteed rights. The judiciary is the ultimate guardian of the Constitution, and when the legislature fails to provide the means to enforce a constitutional right, it becomes the responsibility of the courts to do so. The court noted that the Legislature had begun to act by creating guidelines for firefighters and expressed confidence that it would address other public employees in due course. Therefore, judicial intervention is premature, but the court explicitly warned that if the Legislature does not act within a reasonable time, the court will, in an appropriate future case, fashion the necessary guidelines by judicial decree to enforce the constitutional right to collective bargaining for public employees.
Analysis:
This case exemplifies the tension between judicial restraint and judicial power in enforcing constitutional rights. While upholding the core principle of separation of powers by refusing to directly order the legislature to act, the court asserted its authority as the ultimate enforcer of the constitution. By threatening to 'fashion such guidelines by judicial decree,' the court created a powerful incentive for legislative action, effectively achieving its goal without overstepping its formal constitutional boundaries. This decision establishes a precedent for judicial intervention when legislative inaction leaves a constitutional right without a practical remedy, serving as a warning to legislatures that failure to implement constitutional mandates can lead to court-imposed solutions.
