Cox Enterprises, Inc. v. News-Journal Corp.
36 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1097, 510 F.3d 1350, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 29533 (2007)
Rule of Law:
Florida Statute § 607.1436 grants a court broad discretion in determining the "fair value" of shares, allowing the use of generally accepted valuation methods and requiring that the valuation of a "going concern" assume the business will be managed in a reasonably prudent manner, normalizing financial data to reflect this and avoid double-counting for past mismanagement.
Facts:
- Cox Enterprises, Inc. (Cox) is a privately held Delaware corporation that acquired and maintained a 47.5% interest in News-Journal Corporation (NJC) common stock since 1969.
- NJC is a closely held Florida corporation controlled by the Davidson family, which publishes the Daytona Beach News-Journal and has a wholly-owned subsidiary, Volusia Pennysaver, Inc.
- Tippen Davidson, in his capacity as CEO of NJC, helped create and served in various capacities for several non-profit "Cultural Entities" (FIF, CFCE, SMT, LACI).
- Despite a "spin-off strategy" initiated in 1993 to reduce contributions to Seaside Music Theater (SMT), NJC's total contributions to SMT rose to $1.8 million by 2000.
- In 1996, NJC provided $13 million for naming rights to Lively Arts Center, Inc. (LACI), an upscale performing arts center, an expenditure which the district court later found to be corporate waste.
- NJC initially treated contributions to Cultural Entities as charitable tax deductions but began classifying them as business expenses for corporate promotion after exceeding maximum allowed charitable deductions.
- Cox first learned of the $13 million naming rights agreement on March 10, 2004, and subsequently filed suit on May 11, 2004, alleging various acts of fraud, waste, and mismanagement against NJC.
Procedural Posture:
- Cox Enterprises, Inc. (Cox) filed suit against News-Journal Corporation (NJC) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, alleging various acts of fraud, waste, and mismanagement.
- NJC elected to purchase Cox's shares "at the 'fair value' of the shares" pursuant to Florida Statute § 607.1436(1) to avoid potential corporate dissolution.
- The parties were unable to agree on the "fair value" of Cox's shares, leading the district court to hold a bench trial to make this determination.
- The district court, crediting Cox's expert testimony regarding valuation methods, found that the fair value of Cox's 47.5% interest in NJC was $129,200,000.
- NJC appealed the district court's determination of "fair value," and Cox cross-appealed, arguing that the valuation should have included compensation for past misconduct and an award of prejudgment interest.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a district court abuse its discretion in determining the "fair value" of a minority shareholder's stock under Florida Statute § 607.1436 by utilizing a fair market value/comparable sales analysis, defining "going concern" to assume reasonably prudent management, normalizing operating margins to reflect this, and refusing to make an additional adjustment for past corporate waste or to award prejudgment interest?
Opinions:
Majority - Birch, Circuit Judge
No, the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining the "fair value" of Cox's shares under Florida Statute § 607.1436 by utilizing a fair market value/comparable sales analysis, defining "going concern" to assume reasonably prudent management, normalizing operating margins to reflect this, and refusing to make an additional adjustment for past corporate waste or to award prejudgment interest. Florida law grants trial courts significant discretion in selecting valuation methods for "fair value," recognizing that appropriate methods may include techniques generally accepted in the financial community, such as fair market value based on comparable sales, especially when no distorting corporate actions like imminent mergers are present. The court's definition of a "going concern" as a business managed in a reasonably prudent manner going forward is consistent with legal precedent and prevents incentivizing majority shareholders to depress share values through mismanagement. Normalizing the operating margin of NJC to that of comparable independent newspapers effectively corrects for financial distortions caused by past waste and inefficiencies, thus making an additional adjustment for corporate waste redundant and amounting to a double recovery. Finally, the decision not to award prejudgment interest falls within the broad discretion granted by Fla. Stat. § 607.1436(5), particularly considering NJC's financial constraints, the court's balancing of the parties' interests (allowing installment payments for NJC's continued operation), and Cox's continued exercise of shareholder rights and receipt of dividends during the prejudgment period.
Analysis:
This case affirms the broad discretion afforded to courts under Florida law in determining the "fair value" of shares, particularly for closely held corporations involved in shareholder disputes. It establishes that a court may use fair market value as a component of "fair value" when no market distortions exist, and crucially, that the valuation of a "going concern" must assume reasonably prudent management going forward. The decision clarifies that normalizing financial data, such as operating margins, can adequately account for past mismanagement, thereby precluding additional adjustments for corporate waste to avoid double-counting. Furthermore, it reinforces the highly discretionary nature of prejudgment interest awards, allowing courts to consider a corporation's ability to operate and a shareholder's continued benefits from ownership during the litigation period.
