Cortezano v. Salin Bank & Trust Co.
680 F.3d 936 (2012)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Title VII's prohibition on discrimination based on "national origin" does not extend to discrimination based on a person's alienage or unauthorized immigration status. Therefore, an adverse employment action taken against an employee due to their spouse's status as an unauthorized alien is not a violation of Title VII.
Facts:
- Kristi Cortezano was an employee at Salin Bank & Trust Company.
- She was married to Javier Cortezano, a Mexican citizen who was residing in the United States without authorization.
- Kristi helped Javier open personal and business bank accounts at Salin Bank using an Individual Tax Identification Number (ITIN).
- Kristi informed her supervisor, Stacy Novotny, of Javier's unauthorized status when requesting a vacation to help him with citizenship proceedings in Mexico.
- The bank's security officer, Mike Hubbs, investigated the matter, expressing concern that Javier, as an "illegal alien from Mexico," had used fraudulent documents to open the accounts.
- During a meeting about the accounts, Hubbs yelled at Kristi and insulted Javier.
- Salin Bank later scheduled another meeting, which Kristi refused to attend without her lawyer present.
- After Kristi left, Salin Bank sent her a letter terminating her employment for refusing to participate in the meeting.
Procedural Posture:
- Kristi Cortezano filed suit against Salin Bank in Indiana state court, alleging state law claims of blacklisting, defamation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
- Cortezano later amended her complaint to add a federal claim for employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
- Due to the new federal claim, Salin Bank removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.
- The district court granted Salin Bank's motion for summary judgment, dismissing all of Cortezano's claims.
- Kristi Cortezano, as appellant, appealed the district court's grant of summary judgment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit; Salin Bank is the appellee.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does Title VII's prohibition on national origin discrimination prevent an employer from firing an employee based on the unauthorized alienage status of her spouse?
Opinions:
Majority - Wood, Circuit Judge.
No. An employer's termination of an employee based on her spouse's status as an unauthorized alien does not constitute discrimination on the basis of national origin under Title VII. Even assuming Title VII protects against associational discrimination based on a spouse's protected characteristic, the claim fails because alienage is not a protected classification. The court found that Salin Bank's actions were motivated by Javier's unauthorized presence in the U.S., not his Mexican heritage. This conclusion was supported by the security officer's repeated references to Javier as an "illegal alien" in his reports and his decision to report the matter to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Citing the Supreme Court's decision in Espinoza v. Farah Mfg. Co., the court affirmed that Title VII distinguishes between national origin (ancestry) and alienage (citizenship or immigration status), and explicitly does not prohibit discrimination based on the latter. A subsequent statute addressing immigration-related employment discrimination, 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, also explicitly excludes unauthorized aliens from its protections.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the long-standing precedent from Espinoza v. Farah Mfg. Co., solidifying the distinction between unprotected 'alienage' discrimination and protected 'national origin' discrimination under Title VII. It clarifies that even if associational discrimination claims are cognizable, the underlying characteristic of the associate must be one protected by the statute. The ruling effectively creates a carve-out, allowing employers to take adverse actions against employees based on their close association with unauthorized aliens, provided the employer's motive is demonstrably tied to immigration status rather than race or ethnicity. This highlights a significant limitation in Title VII's scope and may shield employers from liability in similar situations.
Unlock the full brief for Cortezano v. Salin Bank & Trust Co.