Commonwealth v. Powell
2001 Mass. LEXIS 73, 433 Mass. 399, 742 N.E.2d 1061 (2001)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An object that is not inherently dangerous can be considered a 'dangerous weapon' for the purpose of an armed robbery conviction if it is used or displayed in a way that would cause a reasonable person to believe it is capable of inflicting serious bodily injury or death.
Facts:
- Theresa Campbell was working as a cashier at a gasoline station convenience store in Plymouth.
- Walter L. Powell entered the store, approached the counter, and demanded the money from the cash register.
- Powell told Campbell not to move because he had a gun and threatened to shoot her if she 'tried anything.'
- Powell had an object concealed under his jacket and placed his hand on it several times.
- Campbell could see about one inch of the object protruding from the jacket, which she described as looking like 'two wooden sticks.'
- Believing Powell might have a real gun, Campbell complied as he took approximately $170 and then forced her to walk with him for five to ten minutes before letting her go.
- A police officer later found a wooden replica of a double-barreled shotgun in the roadway near the store.
- Campbell subsequently identified the replica as the object Powell had under his jacket during the robbery.
Procedural Posture:
- Walter L. Powell was tried in a Massachusetts trial court and convicted by a jury of armed robbery, kidnapping, and assault and battery.
- At trial, the judge denied Powell's motion for a required finding of not guilty on the armed robbery charge, which sought to reduce it to unarmed robbery.
- Powell (appellant) appealed the convictions to the Massachusetts Appeals Court, arguing the replica gun was not a dangerous weapon.
- The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts (the highest court in the state) transferred the case from the Appeals Court on its own motion for direct review.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a replica gun, which is incapable of inflicting serious injury, qualify as a 'dangerous weapon' for the purposes of an armed robbery conviction if the victim reasonably believes it is a real weapon capable of causing harm?
Opinions:
Majority - Sosman, J.
Yes. A replica gun qualifies as a dangerous weapon if it reasonably appears to the victim to be capable of inflicting serious injury or death. The court held that the definition of 'dangerous weapon' encompasses not only items that are inherently dangerous but also items that are displayed in a way that they reasonably appear capable of causing serious harm. The court distinguished this case from Commonwealth v. Howard, where the defendant merely claimed to have a gun but possessed no object at all. In this case, Powell possessed an actual object—the replica gun—and used it to instill fear. The jury was properly instructed to determine whether, under all the circumstances, it was reasonable for the victim to believe the object was a real weapon. Given Powell's verbal threats, his gestures, and the appearance of the object, the jury could find that the replica reasonably appeared capable of inflicting serious injury, thus qualifying it as a dangerous weapon for an armed robbery conviction.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces and clarifies the 'apparent ability' doctrine for determining what constitutes a dangerous weapon in Massachusetts. It solidifies the legal distinction between a defendant who merely feigns having a weapon (no object) and one who uses a non-functional or replica weapon (an actual object). By focusing on the victim's reasonable perception of danger, the ruling ensures that the law addresses the fear and intimidation central to the crime of armed robbery. This precedent makes it more difficult for defendants to mitigate an armed robbery charge by later proving the weapon they brandished was fake, thus aligning the severity of the charge with the terror experienced by the victim.
