Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. McDonnell
287 F. Supp. 3d 213 (2018)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Virtual currencies are commodities under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has jurisdiction to prosecute fraud in the cash or spot market for those currencies, even when the fraud does not involve futures or derivative contracts.
Facts:
- Patrick McDonnell, through his company Coin Drop Markets, offered investment services related to virtual currencies like Bitcoin and Litecoin.
- McDonnell advertised on websites and social media, soliciting customers to pay for 'membership' in trading groups.
- He promised customers expert trading advice and guaranteed high returns, such as profits of up to '300%' per week.
- Customers paid McDonnell membership fees and also transferred virtual currency directly to him for 'day' trading on their behalf.
- After receiving payments and investments, McDonnell provided little to no trading advice and failed to generate the promised returns.
- Around July 2017, McDonnell shut down his websites and social media accounts, ceasing all communication with customers.
- McDonnell refused to return customer funds and instead misappropriated their money and virtual currency.
Procedural Posture:
- The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed a complaint against Patrick McDonnell and his company, CabbageTech, Corp. (d/b/a Coin Drop Markets), in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York (a federal trial court).
- The complaint alleged that the defendants operated a fraudulent virtual currency scheme in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA).
- The CFTC sought a preliminary injunction, monetary penalties, and other relief.
- Defendant McDonnell filed a pro se motion to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction.
- The District Court held an evidentiary hearing to consider the CFTC's request for a preliminary injunction and to address the jurisdictional question.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have authority under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) to prosecute a fraudulent scheme involving the direct sale of virtual currencies to customers in interstate commerce?
Opinions:
Majority - Weinstein, J.
Yes. The CFTC has authority under the Commodity Exchange Act to prosecute fraudulent schemes involving virtual currencies sold in interstate commerce. The court's reasoning is twofold. First, virtual currencies are commodities under the CEA. The Act's definition of 'commodity' is broad, including not just enumerated agricultural products but also 'all other goods and articles...and all services, rights, and interests...in which contracts for future delivery are presently or in the future dealt in.' Because virtual currencies function as goods exchanged in a market and because futures contracts based on them are now traded on regulated exchanges, they fall squarely within this definition. Second, the Dodd-Frank Act expanded the CFTC’s enforcement power to cover fraud in spot markets. The CEA now makes it unlawful to use any manipulative or deceptive device 'in connection with any...contract of sale of any commodity in interstate commerce,' which gives the CFTC authority to police fraud even where no futures or derivatives are involved.
Analysis:
This decision was one of the first by a federal court to definitively classify virtual currencies as 'commodities' under the Commodity Exchange Act. By doing so, it significantly solidified the CFTC's jurisdiction and authority to regulate the burgeoning cryptocurrency space. The ruling's most important impact is its confirmation that the CFTC's anti-fraud powers extend to the cash or 'spot' market for cryptocurrencies, a domain previously considered a regulatory gray area. This precedent empowers federal regulators to pursue a wider range of fraudulent schemes and manipulations, offering greater protection to investors and shaping the legal landscape for digital assets in the United States.
