Cole v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska
1996 Alas. App. LEXIS 36, 1996 WL 532499, 923 P.2d 820 (1996)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

A confession is involuntary and must be suppressed if, under the totality of the circumstances, police conduct involving multiple, synergistic forms of psychological coercion and deception overbears the suspect's will to resist. The cumulative effect of various deceptive tactics can create a level of coerciveness that surpasses the sum of the individual parts.


Facts:

  • George E. Cole caught his sixteen-year-old adopted daughter, C.C., smoking.
  • Cole offered C.C. a deal where she could continue smoking if she would let him teach her 'the ways of the Ninja.'
  • The 'Ninja training' sessions escalated from calisthenics to C.C. exercising first in her underwear and then completely nude.
  • During one session where both were nude, Cole lifted C.C.'s breasts with his hands under the pretext of checking her muscular development.
  • When C.C. asked Cole to stop touching her, he complied, but then asked her to touch him, which she refused.
  • The next day, C.C. reported the incident to a friend's mother, who notified the police.
  • Cole called the police station to report C.C. as a runaway, and later called again after learning she had accused him of molestation.
  • Police Officer Todd McGillivray invited Cole to the station under the pretext of taking a runaway report, but with the actual intent to interrogate him.

Procedural Posture:

  • The state introduced George E. Cole's confession to a grand jury, which issued an indictment for second-degree sexual abuse of a minor.
  • Prior to trial, Cole moved in the Superior Court (trial court) to suppress his confession, arguing it was involuntary.
  • The Superior Court Judge reviewed the interrogation tape and denied the motion to suppress, finding the confession voluntary.
  • At trial, the confession was admitted into evidence, and Cole was convicted.
  • Cole (appellant) appealed his conviction to the Court of Appeals of Alaska (this court), challenging the denial of his suppression motion.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a police interrogation that combines multiple deceptive tactics—including threats of a non-existent court-ordered polygraph, false claims of having obtained incriminating electronic surveillance, and promises of psychological help contingent upon confessing—render a suspect's resulting confession involuntary?


Opinions:

Majority - Bryner, Chief Judge

Yes. A confession is involuntary when the totality of the circumstances indicates that police conduct was so coercive as to overbear the defendant’s will. In this case, Officer McGillivray employed an unrelenting array of deceptive tactics that had a synergistic coercive effect. The threat of a court-ordered polygraph was an impermissible misrepresentation of law, the false claim of having a recording from a `Glass` warrant created a sense of futility, and the repeated assurances of help, which were ultimately conditioned on Cole confessing, functioned as an improper inducement. The court rejected the trial court's 'compartmentalized' analysis, finding it absurd to believe these tactics were not causally related. The combined impact of these deceptions rendered Cole's confession involuntary and a violation of due process.



Analysis:

This decision emphasizes that in assessing the voluntariness of a confession, courts must consider the cumulative or 'synergistic' impact of all police tactics used, rather than evaluating each deception in isolation. It establishes a strong precedent in Alaska against the combination of different types of psychological coercion, such as misrepresenting the law (court-ordered polygraph), fabricating evidence (fake warrant), and offering improper inducements (help contingent on confession). The case reinforces that the due process standard for voluntariness is not just about ensuring reliability, but also about preventing fundamentally unfair, 'inquisitorial' police methods that are incompatible with the American system of justice.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Cole v. State (1996) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.