Clemons v. Thornton
993 So.2d 1054 (2008)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under Article X, § 4(c) of the Florida Constitution, the owner of a homestead property must be joined by their spouse when conveying any interest in the homestead to a third party; any such conveyance attempted without the spouse's joinder is void.
Facts:
- W.C. Clemons, Jr. and his wife, Ruth Clemons, lived together on a property that was their constitutional homestead.
- W.C. Clemons, Jr. had a daughter from a previous marriage, Joyce M. Thornton.
- On February 23, 1993, W.C. Clemons, Jr. executed a preprinted warranty deed for the homestead property.
- The deed named himself and Ruth Clemons as grantees and included a typewritten provision stating that upon the death of the survivor, the property would be conveyed to Joyce M. Thornton.
- Ruth Clemons did not sign or join in the execution of this deed.
- W.C. Clemons, Jr. later died intestate (without a will), survived by his wife Ruth, his daughter Joyce, and other lineal descendants.
- After his death, Ruth Clemons executed a new deed purporting to convey the property to herself and her grandson, Lloyd Gilpin, Jr.
Procedural Posture:
- Joyce M. Thornton filed a lawsuit in a Florida trial court against Ruth Clemons and Lloyd Gilpin, Jr., seeking declaratory relief regarding ownership of the property.
- The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Joyce M. Thornton.
- The trial court's judgment found the 1993 deed had successfully created a life estate for W.C. and Ruth Clemons, with a vested remainder to Joyce M. Thornton.
- Ruth Clemons and Lloyd Gilpin, Jr., as appellants, appealed the trial court's summary judgment to the Florida District Court of Appeal.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a deed conveying homestead property, executed by only the owner spouse without the joinder of the non-owner spouse, validly transfer a remainder interest to a third party?
Opinions:
Majority - Benton, J.
No. A deed conveying an interest in homestead property to a third party is void if it is not joined by both spouses. The court first affirmed the trial court's interpretation of the deed's intent, which was to create a life estate for W.C. and Ruth Clemons with a remainder interest to Joyce Thornton. The conveyance of the life estate between the spouses was valid under Florida statute. However, the attempted conveyance of the remainder interest to a third party, Joyce Thornton, was void because it failed to comply with the Florida Constitution's strict requirement that both spouses must join in any alienation of homestead property. A purported transfer of homestead property without the required spousal joinder is not merely voidable but is void. Because the conveyance of the remainder was ineffective, that interest was retained by W.C. Clemons. Upon his intestate death, Florida statute dictates that his surviving spouse, Ruth Clemons, takes a life estate in the homestead, and his lineal descendants in being at the time of his death receive a vested remainder.
Analysis:
This decision reaffirms the stringent constitutional protections afforded to homestead property in Florida and clarifies that the spousal joinder requirement applies to the conveyance of any interest, including future interests like remainders. The ruling illustrates the principle of severability, where an invalid provision in a deed (the remainder) can be struck down without invalidating a valid provision (the life estate between spouses). This case serves as a critical reminder for estate planners that any instrument attempting to devise homestead property to a third party requires strict compliance with the spousal joinder rule to avoid having the conveyance declared void and the property distributed via intestacy statutes.
Unlock the full brief for Clemons v. Thornton