City of Newport et al. v. Fact Concerts, Inc., et al.
453 U.S. 247 (1981)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A municipality is immune from liability for punitive damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Facts:
- Fact Concerts, Inc., a concert promotion company, obtained a license from the City of Newport to present summer concerts at Fort Adams, a state park.
- The contract allowed the city to cancel the license if demanded by the 'interests of public safety.'
- Fact Concerts hired the band Blood, Sweat and Tears, which members of the Newport City Council characterized as a 'rock group' that would attract a 'rowdy' audience.
- The City Council, concerned about potential disturbances, initially voted to cancel the license unless Blood, Sweat and Tears was removed from the program.
- This decision was publicized, adversely affecting ticket sales.
- Days later, on the afternoon before the first scheduled performance, the Council met again and, citing pretextual reasons that contract safety conditions were not met, voted to cancel the contract entirely.
- The council offered a new contract for the same dates that specifically excluded Blood, Sweat and Tears.
- Fact Concerts obtained a state court restraining order, and the concert took place as scheduled but with fewer than half the tickets sold.
Procedural Posture:
- Fact Concerts, Inc. sued the City of Newport, its mayor, and council members in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
- At trial, the court instructed the jury it could award punitive damages against the city, and the city's attorneys did not object to this instruction.
- The jury awarded Fact Concerts compensatory damages and $200,000 in punitive damages against the city.
- In a post-trial motion for a new trial, the city argued for the first time that municipalities are immune from punitive damages under § 1983.
- The District Court noted the objection was untimely but addressed the merits, finding municipalities could be liable for punitive damages, though it reduced the award to $75,000 via remittitur.
- The City of Newport (as appellant) appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
- The Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that the city had waived its challenge by not objecting at trial and that the jury instruction did not constitute 'plain error.'
- The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the punitive damages issue.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
May a municipality be held liable for punitive damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983?
Opinions:
Majority - Justice Blackmun
No. A municipality is immune from punitive damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court's analysis rests on two pillars: history and public policy. Historically, when Congress enacted § 1983 in 1871, there was a well-established common law principle that municipalities were immune from punitive damages. Courts reasoned that such awards unjustly punished innocent taxpayers for the malicious acts of officials. The legislative history of § 1983, including the debates over the Sherman Amendment, reveals no congressional intent to abolish this immunity and shows concern over imposing unmanageable financial burdens on local governments. From a public policy perspective, the purposes of punitive damages—retribution and deterrence—are not served by levying them against a municipality. Retribution against blameless taxpayers is unjust, as punitive damages are a windfall to a compensated plaintiff paid for by the public. Deterrence is not advanced effectively because there are better means, such as awarding compensatory damages against the city and punitive damages directly against the culpable officials based on their personal financial resources. Finally, allowing punitive damages against municipalities would pose a serious risk to their financial integrity.
Dissenting - Justice Brennan
The Court should not have decided the merits of the punitive damages issue. The City of Newport failed to object to the jury instruction on punitive damages during the trial, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 51. This procedural default precludes appellate review of the issue. The Court of Appeals correctly held that the trial court's instruction did not constitute 'plain error' and properly declined to overlook the city's failure to object. The majority's decision to disregard a clear procedural rule in a non-exceptional case is an unwarranted and unprecedented departure from standard judicial practice.
Analysis:
This decision establishes a bright-line rule that municipalities are absolutely immune from punitive damages under § 1983. It significantly limits the scope of municipal liability first established in Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Services. By shielding municipal treasuries from large, unpredictable punitive awards, the Court protects taxpayers and public services. The ruling reinforces the principle that § 1983 remedies must be interpreted in light of the common law background of 1871 and solidifies a bifurcated approach where compensatory liability falls on the entity while punitive liability is reserved for the individual wrongdoer.
Unlock the full brief for City of Newport et al. v. Fact Concerts, Inc., et al.