City of Naples v. Central Plaza of Naples, Inc.
303 So. 2d 423 (1974)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
When a zoning ordinance specifies the standards for granting a special exception, a legislative body's decision must be based solely on those enumerated standards. Denying an application based on factors not listed in the ordinance is arbitrary and unreasonable.
Facts:
- Central Plaza of Naples, Inc. owned a large property zoned 'K-a Industrial' in the City of Naples, which was occupied by a shopping center.
- The property was bordered by the Gordon River on three sides and Goodlette Road on the fourth.
- Central Plaza sought to build three four-story multifamily residential buildings on the portion of the property facing the river.
- The city's zoning ordinance permitted multifamily residences in this zone as a 'special exception' if certain standards were met.
- The proposed plan included a separate access road directly onto Goodlette Road and a buffer of pine trees between the residences and the shopping center.
- Central Plaza also agreed to limit permanent residency in the units to individuals over the age of sixteen.
Procedural Posture:
- Central Plaza of Naples, Inc. filed a petition with the City of Naples for a special exception to the zoning code.
- The Planning Board and the Naples City Council held a joint public hearing on the petition.
- The Planning Board recommended approval of the exception by a four-to-one vote.
- The City Council voted three-to-three, and the motion for approval was declared to have failed.
- Central Plaza filed suit in a trial court seeking, among other remedies, a mandatory injunction to compel the city to grant the exception.
- The trial court found that the City's denial was arbitrary, unreasonable, and capricious, and entered an order directing the City to grant the special exception.
- The City of Naples, as appellant, appealed the trial court's order to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Is a city council's denial of a special exception arbitrary and unreasonable when the applicant meets all of the specific standards set forth in the zoning ordinance, but the denial is based on factors not listed in the ordinance?
Opinions:
Majority - Grimes, Judge
Yes. A city council's denial of a special exception is arbitrary and unreasonable when the applicant has complied with all the specific standards set forth in the governing ordinance. A zoning authority is strictly limited to considering only the criteria enumerated in the ordinance when evaluating a special exception application. In this case, the City of Naples denied the petition based on concerns about increased traffic on Goodlette Road and potential overpopulation creating excessive demands on utilities. However, the ordinance's standards only addressed traffic on 'minor residential streets,' and Goodlette Road is a main commercial artery. The ordinance made no mention of the project's impact on utilities or other services. Because these concerns were not among the criteria listed in the ordinance, they were 'legally irrelevant' to the council's decision. Since the evidence showed that Central Plaza's petition fully complied with all prescribed standards, the special exception should have been granted.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the principle that administrative bodies, such as zoning boards and city councils, are creatures of the ordinances that empower them and must operate strictly within the confines of that authority. It limits the discretion of such bodies by preventing them from denying special exception applications based on generalized public welfare concerns unless those concerns are explicitly codified as standards in the zoning ordinance. This holding provides greater certainty and predictability for developers and property owners, as it establishes that compliance with the written criteria in the code is sufficient for approval. It forces municipalities to be comprehensive and explicit when drafting zoning standards if they wish to consider a broad range of potential impacts.
