Christian Echoes National Ministry, Inc. v. United States
470 F.2d 849 (1973)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A religious or charitable organization is not eligible for tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) if a substantial part of its activities involves attempting to influence legislation or intervening in political campaigns. The prohibition on attempting to influence legislation is broadly construed to include indirect advocacy and campaigns aimed at molding public opinion on political issues, not just direct lobbying of specific bills.
Facts:
- Christian Echoes National Ministry, Inc., a nonprofit religious corporation, was organized in 1951 by its president, Dr. Billy James Hargis.
- The organization's stated purpose was to apply Christian teachings to solve the world's economic, political, and spiritual problems.
- The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) granted Christian Echoes tax-exempt status as a religious and educational organization in 1953.
- From 1961-1968, the organization's activities included publications, broadcasts, and rallies with the stated mission of battling Communism, socialism, and political liberalism.
- Its publications and broadcasts frequently urged the public to contact their congressmen to support or oppose specific legislative issues, such as constitutional amendments, immigration laws, foreign aid, and the UN.
- The organization also used its platform to attack political candidates it deemed 'liberal' and to praise or endorse 'conservative' candidates.
- Following a re-examination of these activities, the IRS notified Christian Echoes in 1964 that its tax-exempt status was being revoked, making the revocation official in 1966.
- The IRS based the revocation on findings that the organization engaged in substantial activity to influence legislation and intervened in political campaigns.
Procedural Posture:
- Christian Echoes paid the assessed Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) taxes for the years 1961 and 1963-1968.
- Christian Echoes sued the United States in U.S. District Court (trial court) seeking a refund of the taxes paid.
- The District Court held that Christian Echoes was entitled to the tax exemption and entered judgment in its favor.
- The Government appealed that judgment directly to the U.S. Supreme Court, which vacated the judgment for lack of jurisdiction and remanded the case.
- On remand, the District Court entered the same judgment again, finding in favor of Christian Echoes.
- The Government (appellant) now appeals the District Court's second judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit; Christian Echoes is the appellee.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a nonprofit religious organization lose its tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) when a substantial part of its activities consists of attempting to influence legislation and intervening in political campaigns on behalf of candidates, even if those activities are religiously motivated?
Opinions:
Majority - Barrett, Circuit Judge
Yes. A nonprofit religious organization loses its tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) when a substantial and continuous part of its activities is dedicated to influencing legislation or intervening in political campaigns. The court held that the district court's narrow interpretation of 'attempting to influence legislation'—requiring direct lobbying of specific, pending bills—was clearly erroneous. The correct standard, reflected in Treasury Regulations, is a broad one that includes indirect methods like urging the public to contact legislators and advocating for the adoption or rejection of political positions. Christian Echoes' extensive publications and calls to action on a wide range of political issues, along with its attacks on and endorsements of specific candidates, constituted substantial and continuous political activity, not merely incidental efforts. Furthermore, denying a tax exemption on these grounds does not violate the First Amendment; tax exemption is a legislative grace, not a right, and Congress may validly choose not to subsidize organizations that engage in substantial political activity. The government is not prohibiting speech but is refusing to subsidize it, which serves the compelling governmental interest of maintaining neutrality in political affairs and upholding the separation of church and state.
Analysis:
This decision significantly clarifies the 'substantial part' test for political activity by 501(c)(3) organizations, affirming a broad interpretation that encompasses indirect lobbying and issue advocacy aimed at the public. It establishes that the motivation for political activity, even if sincerely religious, is irrelevant to determining whether the activity disqualifies an organization from tax-exempt status. The ruling reinforces the principle that tax exemption is a conditional privilege, and the government's refusal to subsidize political speech through tax breaks does not infringe upon an organization's First Amendment rights. This precedent solidifies the IRS's authority to police the line between permissible issue advocacy and prohibited political intervention for tax-exempt entities.
Unlock the full brief for Christian Echoes National Ministry, Inc. v. United States