Childs v. United States
1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6179, 1996 WL 227306, 923 F. Supp. 1570 (1996)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The Federal Tort Claims Act's (FTCA) prohibition against punitive damages does not require a court to deduct a decedent's future personal expenses and income taxes from a wrongful death award when the governing state law defines damages without such deductions and does not classify the award as punitive.
Facts:
- On November 10, 1992, Ashley Latrise Scott (age 6), Debra Reese Gordon (age 33 and eight months pregnant), and her unborn child, General Gordon, were traveling in Debra's automobile in Savannah, Georgia.
- A United States Postal Service (USPS) truck wrongfully entered an intersection and struck Debra's vehicle.
- The force of the collision pushed Debra's automobile head-on into another truck.
- Ashley Scott, Debra Gordon, and General Gordon died almost immediately after the collision.
- Ashley was an exceptional first-grade student from a supportive home, though her parents were unmarried and lived apart.
- Debra was a highly-regarded produce manager at Kroger, had a close relationship with her large family, and was preparing to raise her son, General, as a single mother.
- Debra had not disclosed the identity of General's father.
Procedural Posture:
- The decedents' families filed wrongful death actions against the United States of America under the Federal Tort Claims Act in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia.
- The claim for Ashley Scott's pain and suffering was withdrawn by the plaintiffs.
- The court dismissed the claim for General Gordon's pain and suffering following a Georgia Supreme Court decision.
- The United States government admitted it was vicariously liable for the negligence of its employee.
- The parties stipulated to the amounts for funeral, medical, and property damage expenses.
- The cases were consolidated for a bench trial before the District Court solely on the issue of damages for the wrongful death claims and Debra Gordon's pain and suffering claim.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the Federal Tort Claims Act's prohibition against punitive damages require a court to deduct a decedent's future personal expenses and income taxes from a wrongful death award when the underlying state law (Georgia) defines the 'full value of life' without such deductions?
Opinions:
Majority - Nangle, District Judge
No. The Federal Tort Claims Act's (FTCA) prohibition on punitive damages does not compel a deduction for a decedent's personal expenses and taxes when the relevant state law, in this case Georgia's wrongful death statute, calculates the 'full value of life' without such deductions. The FTCA makes the United States liable to the same extent as a private individual under state law, with the exception of punitive damages. The government argued that failing to deduct personal expenses and taxes results in an award that is 'punitive in effect,' relying on pre-Molzof precedent like Harden v. U.S. However, the Supreme Court in Molzof v. United States rejected this 'punitive in effect' test, holding that the FTCA only bars damages that are legally considered 'punitive damages' under traditional common-law principles. Since Georgia courts have consistently held that its wrongful death statute does not permit punitive damages, an award calculated according to that statute is not punitive. Therefore, the award falls within the compensatory or 'gray zone' of damages permissible under the FTCA, and the court will not make the deductions requested by the government.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the significant impact of Molzof v. United States on FTCA damage calculations in wrongful death cases. It establishes that the FTCA's punitive damages bar does not create a federal standard that overrides state-law definitions of compensatory damages. The ruling affirms that if a state's statutory scheme for wrongful death damages is not classified as 'punitive' under that state's own law, the federal government is liable for the full measure, even if it exceeds a strictly 'make-whole' compensatory amount. This strengthens the principle that the FTCA defers to state substantive law on damages and prevents the government from uniformly reducing awards in states with 'full value of life' statutes.
