Chavez v. Carpenter
91 Cal. App. 4th 1433, 111 Cal. Rptr. 2d 534 (2001)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Parents of a deceased adult child may have standing to sue for wrongful death as 'dependent parents' if they can demonstrate they were, to some extent, financially dependent on the decedent for the necessaries of life, creating a triable issue of fact.
Facts:
- Jose and Elsa Chavez's 24-year-old son, Altie Chavez, lived with them and contributed money and services to their household.
- Altie Chavez, who was unmarried, had a two-year-old daughter named Jazmyne Noel Garcia.
- On August 24, 1996, Altie Chavez was killed in an automobile collision caused by Gary Arthur Carpenter, who was driving while intoxicated.
- In September 1996, one month after Altie's death, his daughter Jazmyne was killed in a separate, unrelated automobile accident.
Procedural Posture:
- Jose and Elsa Chavez, among others, filed a civil action against Gary Arthur Carpenter in a state trial court for the wrongful death of their son.
- Carpenter moved for summary adjudication of the Chavez's wrongful death claim, arguing they lacked standing to sue.
- The trial court granted Carpenter's motion for summary adjudication.
- The parties settled all other remaining claims, and a stipulated judgment was entered to permit an appeal of the summary adjudication ruling.
- Jose and Elsa Chavez (appellants) appealed the judgment to the California Court of Appeal.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Do the parents of a deceased adult child have standing to bring a wrongful death action as 'dependent parents' when there is evidence they relied on their son's contributions of money and services for the necessaries of life, even if their son was also survived by a child?
Opinions:
Majority - Wunderlich, J.
Yes. While parents cannot sue as heirs if their child left surviving issue, they may establish standing as 'dependent parents' if there is a triable issue of fact regarding their financial dependence on the decedent for the necessaries of life. The court first determined that Jose and Elsa Chavez (appellants) could not sue as their son's heirs under Code of Civil Procedure section 377.60(a). This is because standing for parents as heirs is only permitted 'if there is no surviving issue of the decedent.' Since their son's daughter, Jazmyne, outlived him, she was his 'surviving issue,' and her cause of action for his wrongful death survived her own subsequent death. However, the court found that the Chavezes raised a triable issue of material fact regarding their standing as 'dependent parents' under section 377.60(b). The court defined 'dependent' as being financially reliant, to some extent, on the decedent for the 'necessaries of life,' such as shelter, food, and clothing. The evidence that their son provided an average of $100 per week, groceries, and significant household and vehicle maintenance services was sufficient to create a factual dispute as to whether the Chavezes relied on this aid for their basic needs, thus precluding summary adjudication.
Analysis:
This case clarifies the two distinct paths for parental standing in California wrongful death actions and reinforces that 'financial dependency' is a flexible, fact-specific inquiry. By holding that being dependent 'to some extent' is sufficient to survive summary judgment, the court lowered the threshold for parents who are not destitute but relied on their child's contributions. This precedent makes it more difficult for defendants to dismiss such claims early in litigation, forcing a factual determination of the financial relationship between the parent and deceased child. The decision also solidifies that 'surviving issue' is determined at the moment of the decedent's death, foreclosing heirship status for parents even if the decedent's child dies shortly thereafter.
Unlock the full brief for Chavez v. Carpenter