Cesarini v. United States

District Court, N.D. Ohio
47 Ohio Op. 2d 27, 296 F.Supp. 3, 18 Ohio Misc. 1 (1969)
ELI5:

Sections

Rule of Law:

Locked

The Legal Principle

This section distills the key legal rule established or applied by the court—the one-liner you'll want to remember for exams.

Facts:

  • In 1957, the plaintiffs, a husband and wife, purchased a used piano at an auction for approximately $15.00.
  • The piano was used by the plaintiffs' daughter for piano lessons for several years.
  • In 1964, while cleaning the piano, the plaintiffs discovered $4,467.00 in old currency hidden inside.
  • The plaintiffs were unable to ascertain the original owner of the money.
  • After finding the money, the plaintiffs exchanged the old currency for new currency at a bank and decided to keep the piano rather than discard it as previously planned.

Procedural Posture:

Locked

How It Got Here

Understand the case's journey through the courts—who sued whom, what happened at trial, and why it ended up on appeal.

Issue:

Locked

Legal Question at Stake

This section breaks down the central legal question the court had to answer, written in plain language so you can quickly grasp what's being decided.

Opinions:

Locked

Majority, Concurrences & Dissents

Read clear summaries of each judge's reasoning—the majority holding, any concurrences, and dissenting views—so you understand all perspectives.

Analysis:

Locked

Why This Case Matters

Get the bigger picture—how this case fits into the legal landscape, its lasting impact, and the key takeaways for your class discussion.

Ready to ace your next class?

7 days free, cancel anytime

G

Gunnerbot

AI-powered case assistant

Loaded: Cesarini v. United States (1969)

Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"