Cauble v. Handler
1973 Tex. App. LEXIS 2498, 503 S.W.2d 362 (1973)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Upon dissolution of a partnership, assets must be valued at their fair market value for accounting purposes, and the representative of a deceased or non-continuing partner has the right to elect to receive either interest on the value of their share or a portion of the profits generated from the business's continuation post-dissolution.
Facts:
- Thomas Cauble and Tom Handler were 50/50 partners in a retail furniture and appliance business.
- Thomas Cauble died on May 18, 1971, which legally dissolved the partnership.
- After Cauble's death, Handler, the surviving partner, continued to operate the business, using and selling the partnership's assets.
- Handler conducted an inventory of the partnership assets, valuing them at their original cost or 'book value', not their current market value.
- Based on this book value, Handler filed a tax return stating each partner's interest was $40,344.39.
- By continuing the business for approximately one year after Cauble's death, Handler generated a net profit of $40,163.42.
Procedural Posture:
- The administratrix of Thomas Cauble's estate sued the surviving partner, Tom Handler, in a Texas trial court for an accounting of partnership assets.
- The trial court, sitting without a jury, appointed an auditor to state the account between the parties.
- The trial court entered a judgment for the plaintiff for $20.95 plus interest, basing its valuation of partnership assets on their book value.
- The trial court denied the plaintiff's claim for a share of the profits earned after Cauble's death, awarding interest instead.
- The trial court taxed all court costs, including a $1,800 auditor's fee, against the plaintiff.
- The plaintiff, as administratrix of the estate, appealed the trial court's judgment to the Texas Court of Civil Appeals.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Upon dissolution of a partnership due to a partner's death, must the partnership assets be valued at market value for accounting purposes, and is the deceased partner's estate entitled to elect a share of profits generated by the surviving partner's continuation of the business instead of interest?
Opinions:
Majority - Brewster, Justice
Yes. Upon dissolution, partnership assets must be valued at market value, and the deceased partner's representative is entitled to elect to receive a share of the profits earned from the continuation of the business instead of interest. The trial court erred by using book value to determine the partnership's worth, as precedent establishes that market value is the correct standard and book values are considered arbitrary. Furthermore, under the Texas Uniform Partnership Act (Sec. 42), the representative of a deceased partner has a clear statutory right to choose between interest on their share's value or the profits attributable to the use of their partnership property if the business is continued. The plaintiff explicitly made this election for profits, and the trial court's decision to award interest instead was a reversible error.
Analysis:
This case solidifies two critical protections for non-continuing partners or their estates upon partnership dissolution. It firmly rejects the use of book value for asset accounting, mandating the fairer, more accurate standard of market value. This prevents a continuing partner from undervaluing the business to the detriment of the outgoing partner. The decision also powerfully affirms the statutory election of profits over interest, preventing a surviving partner from using the deceased's capital to generate profits while limiting the estate's return to a simple interest payment, thereby incentivizing a prompt and fair winding up of partnership affairs.
