Cathcart v. Commissioner
1977 T.C. Memo. 328, 1977 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 113, 36 T.C.M. 1321 (1977)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
When loan points are withheld by a lender from the principal of a loan, they are not considered "paid" by a cash-basis taxpayer in that year. Therefore, the taxpayer cannot deduct the full amount of the points in the year the loan is originated but must amortize the deduction over the term of the loan.
Facts:
- On January 15, 1973, Kenneth and Joan Cathcart obtained a mortgage loan from Southern Federal Savings and Loan Association.
- The face amount of the loan was $57,600.
- Southern Federal withheld $1,086.60 in "points" directly from the loan proceeds.
- The parties stipulated that these points constituted a charge for interest, not for services.
- Due to the withheld points and other fees, the Cathcarts received only $55,039.92 in actual cash from the $57,600 loan.
- The Cathcarts, who use the cash method of accounting for tax purposes, claimed a full deduction for the $1,086.60 in points on their 1973 income tax return.
Procedural Posture:
- Kenneth and Joan Cathcart filed a joint Federal income tax return for 1973, claiming a full deduction for mortgage points.
- The Commissioner of Internal Revenue disallowed the deduction for the full amount of the points and issued a notice of deficiency.
- The Commissioner contended that the points deduction must be prorated over the 29-year term of the loan.
- The Cathcarts petitioned the United States Tax Court for a redetermination of the deficiency.
- Petitioners conceded other disallowed deductions, leaving the deductibility of the withheld points as the sole issue for the court to decide.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
For a cash-basis taxpayer, does withholding "points" from the principal of a loan constitute a "payment" of interest that is fully deductible in the year the loan is obtained?
Opinions:
Majority - Judge Wiles
No. For a cash-basis taxpayer, withholding 'points' from the principal of a loan does not constitute a 'payment' of interest that is fully deductible in the year the loan is obtained. The court's reasoning is controlled by its prior decision in Rubnitz v. Commissioner, which held that deducting a fee from loan proceeds is not a 'payment' under section 163(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. A cash-basis taxpayer must actually disburse funds to be entitled to a deduction. When a lender withholds points, the borrower does not receive the full loan amount and then pay the points back; instead, the borrower simply receives less cash upfront while promising to repay the full face value of the loan over time. This arrangement constitutes a discounted loan, and the interest represented by the points is paid over the life of the loan through the monthly installments, not upfront. Therefore, the deduction for the points must be prorated over the loan's term.
Analysis:
This case clarifies the definition of 'payment' for cash-basis taxpayers concerning loan origination fees, specifically points. It establishes a critical distinction between paying points with separate, non-borrowed funds (which is deductible in the year of payment) and having points withheld from the loan proceeds (which must be amortized). This decision solidifies the precedent from Rubnitz v. Commissioner, preventing taxpayers from obtaining a large, upfront tax deduction for an expense they did not actually pay out-of-pocket in that year, thereby upholding the principle against material distortion of income.
