Lexplug logoLexplug

Case v. ANPAC Louisiana Insurance

District Court, E.D. Louisiana
466 F. Supp. 2d 781 (2006)
ELI5:

Sections

Rule of Law:

Under the Multiparty, Multiforum, Trial Jurisdiction Act (MMTJA), widespread flooding caused by multiple levee breaches does not constitute a 'single accident' and a metropolitan area does not qualify as a 'discrete location' where at least 75 deaths occurred, thus precluding removal to federal court.


Facts:

  • Hurricane Katrina struck the New Orleans area, subjecting the region to high velocity winds and storm surges.
  • Following the hurricane, levees and floodwalls breached at multiple distinct locations, including the 17th Street Canal and London Avenue Canal.
  • These breaches caused catastrophic flooding throughout the Greater New Orleans Metropolitan Area.
  • Gordon and Tanjha Case owned a home that was destroyed, which they attributed to wind force and storm surge.
  • Shirley and Robert Chamberlain owned a home that suffered damage, which they alleged was caused by wind or negligent levee maintenance.
  • More than 75 people died in the aggregate across the region during and in the aftermath of the storm.
  • The homeowners filed claims with their respective insurers (ANPAC and Farm Bureau) for the damage to their properties.
  • The insurers disputed the claims, largely attributing the losses to excluded flood damage rather than covered wind damage.

Procedural Posture:

  • The Case plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against ANPAC in the Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans, Louisiana.
  • The Chamberlain plaintiffs filed a separate lawsuit against Louisiana Farm Bureau in the Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans, Louisiana.
  • ANPAC removed the Case lawsuit to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
  • Louisiana Farm Bureau removed the Chamberlain lawsuit to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
  • Both sets of plaintiffs filed motions to remand their proceedings back to state court.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Do multiple levee breaches affecting a metropolitan area following a hurricane constitute a 'single accident' resulting in at least 75 deaths at a 'discrete location' such that property insurance claims may be removed to federal court under the Multiparty, Multiforum, Trial Jurisdiction Act?


Opinions:

Majority - Duval

No, the levee breaches do not satisfy the MMTJA requirements because they involve multiple distinct accidents rather than a 'single accident,' and the deaths did not occur at a 'discrete location' as defined by the statute. The Court reasoned that the MMTJA was intended to consolidate mass disasters like plane crashes or bridge collapses where liability issues are identical, not widespread natural disasters with diffuse damage. The Court found that the multiple levee breaches were separate events with potentially different causes (e.g., maintenance vs. design), meaning they were not a 'single accident.' Furthermore, the Court determined that the phrase 'discrete location' cannot be interpreted to encompass the entire metro New Orleans area; otherwise, every dispute related to Hurricane Katrina would be federalized, which was not Congress's intent. Finally, the defendants failed to carry their burden of proof to make a prima facie showing that 75 deaths occurred at any one specific, discrete location due to a single breach.



Analysis:

This decision is significant because it strictly limits the scope of federal jurisdiction under the MMTJA regarding large-scale natural disasters. By narrowly defining 'single accident' and 'discrete location,' the Court prevented the federal judiciary from being overwhelmed by thousands of individualized state-law property insurance claims. The ruling establishes that 'piggy-back' jurisdiction under § 1441(e)(1)(B) requires a tight factual nexus—specifically a single causal event and a localized set of fatalities—which widespread flooding from a hurricane generally does not satisfy.

G

Gunnerbot

AI-powered case assistant

Loaded: Case v. ANPAC Louisiana Insurance (2006)

Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"