Calva-Cerqueira v. United States
281 F.Supp.2d 279 (2003)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under the Federal Tort Claims Act, applying District of Columbia law, future economic damages for distinct categories like medical expenses and lost wages should be calculated using different inflation rates and net discount rates that reflect their specific economic realities. The total award is statutorily capped at the amount requested in the plaintiff's initial administrative tort claim unless there is newly discovered evidence or intervening facts.
Facts:
- Enrique Calva-Cerqueira, born in 1979, had a history of substance abuse and emotional issues during his teenage years.
- By early 1998, at age 18, Calva-Cerqueira was showing significant improvement while living with his mother in Virginia; he was attending an adult education program, working part-time at KFC where he had been promoted twice, and playing soccer.
- Calva-Cerqueira came from a highly educated family and had expressed intentions to attend community college and then a four-year university, following the path of his older brother who was in medical school.
- On June 14, 1998, a bus owned and operated by the United States (a Smithsonian Institution bus) ran a red light at an excessive speed and collided with the car Calva-Cerqueira was driving.
- The collision caused Calva-Cerqueira to suffer catastrophic and permanent brain damage, including the loss of his right frontal lobe.
- As a result of his injuries, Calva-Cerqueira was left quadri-paretic, wheelchair-bound, and with severe cognitive, emotional, and physical impairments requiring 24-hour assistance for the rest of his life.
- While permanently disabled from gainful employment, Calva-Cerqueira remains aware of many of his deficits, which causes him significant mental anguish.
Procedural Posture:
- Enrique Calva-Cerqueira filed a suit against the United States in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA).
- On September 8, 1998, Calva-Cerqueira's counsel filed an administrative tort claim with the defendant seeking $20,000,000.
- The district court granted the defendant's motion to bifurcate the proceedings, separating the trial into a liability phase and a damages phase.
- After a three-day bench trial on liability, the court determined on May 3, 2001, that the United States was liable for the accident.
- The case then proceeded to an eight-day bench trial solely on the issue of determining the amount of compensatory damages.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Under the Federal Tort Claims Act and District of Columbia law, must future economic damages for lost wages and medical expenses be calculated using different net discount rates to account for their distinct rates of inflation, and reduced to present value using an after-tax market interest rate?
Opinions:
Majority - Urbina, District Judge
Yes, future economic damages for different types of losses should be calculated using distinct net discount rates that account for their unique inflation rates and then reduced to present value. The court found that applying a single, general inflation rate to all future costs, as the defendant proposed, would fail to make the plaintiff whole, particularly because medical costs historically and foreseeably rise much faster than general inflation. The court adopted the 'market interest rate method' advanced by the plaintiff's expert, which involves: 1) estimating future inflation rates specific to the item of damage (e.g., medical services vs. wages for a college graduate); 2) calculating the total future costs; and 3) discounting that total to present value using an after-tax market interest rate based on safe investments. This resulted in a 0.0% net discount rate for future lost wages and a negative 0.5% net discount rate for future medical expenses. The court also held that under the collateral source rule, the plaintiff could recover the full amount billed for past medical expenses, not just the amount paid after insurance write-offs. Finally, despite calculating total damages to be over $23 million, the court reduced the final award to $20 million, enforcing the statutory cap under 28 U.S.C. § 2675(b), as the plaintiff had not shown 'newly discovered evidence' or 'intervening facts' to justify exceeding the amount sought in his administrative claim.
Analysis:
This case provides a significant endorsement of a sophisticated economic methodology for calculating future damages in the District of Columbia. By approving the use of different net discount rates for medical costs and lost wages, the court allows for a more accurate and just compensation that reflects real-world economic trends, particularly the rapid inflation of healthcare costs. This precedent strengthens the position of plaintiffs with long-term medical needs, allowing them to present evidence of specific cost escalations rather than being limited to a general inflation rate. However, the decision also serves as a stark reminder of the unforgiving nature of the FTCA's administrative claim cap, demonstrating that even in cases of catastrophic injury, the initial claim amount acts as a rigid ceiling on recovery absent a showing that meets the statute's narrow exceptions.
Unlock the full brief for Calva-Cerqueira v. United States