Caldwell v. Cline
156 S.E. 55, 72 A.L.R. 1211, 109 W. Va. 553 (1930)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
When an offer is sent by mail and specifies a time limit for acceptance, the offer becomes effective, and the acceptance period begins to run, upon receipt by the offeree, not upon mailing by the offeror.
Facts:
- W. D. Cline, residing in McDowell County, West Virginia, owned a tract of land on Indian Creek.
- W. H. Caldwell resided in Monroe County, West Virginia, and owned the McKinsey farm.
- On January 29, 1929, Cline addressed a letter to Caldwell, offering to pay $6,000 cash and deed his Indian Creek land in exchange for Caldwell's McKinsey farm.
- Cline's letter explicitly stated that he would give Caldwell "eight days" to accept or reject the offer.
- Caldwell received Cline's offer letter at Peterstown on February 2, 1929.
- On February 8, 1929, Caldwell sent a telegram to Cline stating: "Land deal is made. Prepare deed to me. See letter."
- Cline received Caldwell's telegram on February 9, 1929.
- Cline subsequently refused to carry out the terms of the alleged agreement, and the titles to the farms remained unchanged.
Procedural Posture:
- W. D. Cline (plaintiff) initiated a chancery suit against W. H. Caldwell (defendant) in a trial court (chancery court) seeking specific performance of a contract for the sale and exchange of real estate.
- Caldwell (defendant) filed a demurrer to Cline's (plaintiff's) bill of complaint.
- The chancellor (trial judge) sustained Caldwell's demurrer and dismissed Cline's bill.
- Cline (plaintiff) appealed the chancellor's decision to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the time limit for accepting a contract offer sent by mail begin to run from the date the offer is mailed or from the date it is received by the offeree?
Opinions:
Majority - Lively, President
Yes, the time limit for accepting a contract offer sent by mail begins to run from the date it is received by the offeree. The Court held that an offer sent by mail is not made when it is posted, but rather when it is received by the offeree. Analogizing to in-person communication, the court reasoned that for mutual assent to occur, an offer must come to the knowledge of the party to whom it is addressed. Therefore, a mailed offer is a "continuing offer... which takes effect in the place where the person to whom it is sent receives it." In this case, since Caldwell received the offer on February 2nd, the eight-day acceptance period began on that date. Caldwell's telegram of acceptance, sent on February 8th and received by Cline on February 9th, was thus within the specified time limit. The court also found the offer and acceptance sufficiently definite and rejected the argument that acceptance could only be by letter, as the offer did not specify a means of communication. Therefore, a consummated contract existed.
Analysis:
This case clarifies a critical aspect of contract formation, specifically when a time-limited offer transmitted by mail becomes legally effective. By establishing that the offer is effective upon receipt, the court ensures that the offeree receives the full benefit of the stipulated acceptance period, free from potential delays in postal delivery. This ruling provides greater certainty in contractual dealings involving non-instantaneous communication, particularly relevant in transactions like real estate where clear timelines are essential. It distinguishes the effectiveness of offers from the effectiveness of acceptances (which, under the mailbox rule, are generally effective upon dispatch).
