Burgas v. Stoutz

Supreme Court of Louisiana
174 La. 586, 141 So. 67 (1932)

ELI5:

Rule of Law:

A right of passage granted in a recorded deed is a real (predial) servitude that runs with the land, not a personal right, if it provides a real advantage to the estate and the recorded instrument is sufficient to put subsequent purchasers on inquiry notice of its existence.

Facts:

Mrs. Vincent Pizzolata owned a parcel of land which she subdivided into Lot 'A' and Lot 'B'.
Prior to selling either lot, Mrs. Pizzolata constructed a paved driveway on Lot 'B' adjacent to the boundary with Lot 'A'.
On September 13, 1923, Mrs. Pizzolata sold Lot 'A' to an intermediary, who on the same day sold it to Morris Burgas.
The original deed for Lot 'A' contained a stipulation granting the purchaser, 'its successors and assigns,' the right to use the paved driveway on Lot 'B'.
When this sale was recorded in the public conveyance records, the words 'successors and assigns' were omitted, stating only that the 'Purchaser' had the privilege.
Mrs. Pizzolata subsequently sold Lot 'B' through a series of transactions, with the property ultimately being acquired by Henry L. Stoutz.
The chain of title for Lot 'B' did not mention the servitude benefiting Lot 'A'.
Stoutz notified Burgas of his intention to build a fence that would obstruct Burgas's use of the driveway.

Procedural Posture:

Morris Burgas (plaintiff) filed suit against Henry L. Stoutz (defendant) in the Louisiana trial court, seeking an injunction to prevent the obstruction of a driveway.
The trial court granted a preliminary injunction.
After a trial on the merits, the trial court issued a permanent injunction in favor of Burgas, recognizing his right to use the driveway.
Henry L. Stoutz (defendant-appellant) appealed the trial court's judgment to the Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a recorded stipulation granting a 'purchaser' the privilege of using a paved driveway on an adjacent lot create an enforceable real servitude against a subsequent owner of that adjacent lot, even if the words 'successors and assigns' were omitted from the public record?

Opinions:

Majority - Land, J.

Yes, the recorded stipulation creates an enforceable real servitude against a subsequent owner. The court reasoned that a right of passage is a real (predial) servitude, rather than a personal right, if it confers a 'real advantage' to the dominant estate. Here, the driveway provides real utility to Lot 'A' by freeing up space for a garden or other uses, making the property more desirable and valuable. The grant was made to 'the purchaser,' indicating an intent to benefit the property itself, not a specific individual. Although the words 'successors and assigns' were omitted from the recorded version, the mention of a 'paved driveway in the rear' on 'Lot B' was sufficient notice to place Stoutz on inquiry. A reasonable investigation would have revealed the nature and extent of the servitude, especially since the original deed deposited in the recorder's office, which is effective upon deposit, did contain the words 'successors and assigns'.

Analysis:

This case clarifies the distinction between personal rights and real (predial) servitudes in Louisiana law, emphasizing that the nature of the right is determined by its benefit to the property, not by specific 'magic words' in the recorded document. It reinforces the doctrine of inquiry notice, holding that a purchaser is responsible for investigating any rights or encumbrances suggested by either the public records or the physical condition of the property. The decision protects owners of a dominant estate from losing their rights due to minor clerical errors in public records or omissions in the servient estate's chain of title.

Gunnerbot

AI-powered case assistant

Loaded: Burgas v. Stoutz (1932)

Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"