Brown v. Board of Education (Brown I)
347 U.S. 483 (1954)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
State-mandated segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even with purportedly equal tangible factors, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.
Facts:
- In the states of Kansas, South Carolina, Virginia, and Delaware, state laws either required or permitted the segregation of children in public schools based on their race.
- Minor children of the Negro race were denied admission to public schools attended by white children under these segregation laws.
- The legal representatives for these minor children sought court orders to gain admission to the integrated public schools.
- The states involved argued that racial segregation in schools was permissible under the 'separate but equal' doctrine established in Plessy v. Ferguson.
- In the cases from Kansas, South Carolina, and Virginia, lower courts found that the segregated schools were either equal or were in the process of being equalized in terms of tangible factors like buildings, curricula, and teacher salaries.
Procedural Posture:
- In Kansas, South Carolina, and Virginia, the plaintiffs sued their respective school boards in federal district courts to enjoin the enforcement of state segregation laws.
- In each of these three cases, a three-judge federal district court denied relief to the plaintiffs, upholding the 'separate but equal' doctrine.
- In Delaware, the plaintiffs sued in the Delaware Court of Chancery (a state trial court), which ordered the plaintiffs be admitted to the white schools because the Black schools were inferior.
- The Supreme Court of Delaware (the state's highest court) affirmed the trial court's order.
- The losing parties in the Kansas, South Carolina, and Virginia cases (the plaintiffs) filed direct appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court.
- The losing party in the Delaware case (the state) petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, which was granted.
- The U.S. Supreme Court consolidated the four cases for argument and decision due to the common legal question presented.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other 'tangible' factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Opinions:
Majority - Mr. Chief Justice Warren
Yes, segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race deprives the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities. We conclude that in the field of public education, the doctrine of 'separate but equal' has no place, as separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. The Court's reasoning began by acknowledging that the history of the Fourteenth Amendment was inconclusive regarding its intended effect on public education. However, the Court stressed that it could not 'turn the clock back to 1868' and must instead consider public education's vital role in modern American life. The Court found that education is perhaps the most important function of state and local governments and that where the state provides this opportunity, it must be made available to all on equal terms. The central rationale was the profound psychological impact of segregation on minority children; separating them 'solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone.' This feeling of inferiority, sanctioned by law, retards educational and mental development, thus depriving them of the benefits of an integrated school system. Therefore, any language in Plessy v. Ferguson to the contrary was rejected, and segregation in public education was declared an unconstitutional denial of equal protection of the laws.
Analysis:
Brown v. Board of Education is a landmark decision that fundamentally altered the constitutional landscape of the United States. It expressly overturned the 'separate but equal' doctrine established by Plessy v. Ferguson in the context of public education, effectively declaring state-sponsored segregation unconstitutional. The decision's reliance on social science and the psychological impact of segregation, rather than solely on a comparison of tangible facilities, marked a significant evolution in Equal Protection jurisprudence. This ruling provided the legal foundation for the desegregation of America's public schools and served as a major catalyst for the broader Civil Rights Movement, influencing subsequent legislation and court decisions aimed at dismantling systemic segregation.
