Brooks v. Seaton Place Homeowners Ass'n
2017 WL 2605206, 522 S.W.3d 871, 2017 Ky. App. LEXIS 265 (2017)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An abutting landowner is not liable for injuries sustained on a public sidewalk unless the owner's affirmative conduct created the hazardous condition. A homeowners' association's duty to maintain property is limited to the common areas specifically defined in its governing covenants and does not extend to public sidewalks on individual lots.
Facts:
- On June 1, 2013, Frances Brooks attended a community-wide yard sale in the Seaton Place neighborhood.
- William and Tasha Greenwell, homeowners in Seaton Place, were participating in the yard sale by selling items in front of their home.
- After shopping at the Greenwells' sale, Brooks stepped onto the public sidewalk in front of their home to walk to a neighboring sale.
- While traversing the sidewalk, Brooks's foot got caught on an uneven section, causing her to fall and sustain injuries.
- The Seaton Place HOA covenants required the association to maintain designated 'common areas'.
- The public sidewalk in front of the Greenwells' residence was not located within any of the neighborhood's designated common areas.
- There was no evidence that the Greenwells had taken any action to create or alter the uneven condition of the sidewalk.
Procedural Posture:
- Frances Brooks filed a personal injury lawsuit against the Greenwells, the Seaton Place HOA, and its board members in the Jefferson Circuit Court, the trial court of first instance.
- The HOA and its board members filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing they did not control the sidewalk.
- The Greenwells filed a separate motion for summary judgment, arguing Brooks could not prove causation.
- The Jefferson Circuit Court granted summary judgment in favor of all defendants, concluding they owed no duty of care to Brooks.
- Brooks, as appellant, appealed the summary judgment to the Kentucky Court of Appeals.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does an abutting landowner or a homeowners' association owe a duty of care to a pedestrian injured on an uneven public sidewalk, where the landowner did not affirmatively create the defect and the sidewalk is not part of the association's designated common areas?
Opinions:
Majority - Combs, Judge
No. Neither an abutting landowner nor a homeowners' association owes a duty of care to a pedestrian injured on a public sidewalk under these circumstances. The court reasoned that the general common law rule places the duty to maintain public sidewalks on the municipality, not the adjacent landowner. An exception exists only if the landowner's affirmative act or negligence creates the hazardous condition. The Greenwells' participation in a yard sale did not constitute such an affirmative act. Regarding the HOA, its duties are defined by its covenants, which explicitly limited its maintenance responsibility to designated 'common areas.' Since the sidewalk where Brooks fell was not a common area, the HOA had no contractual or common law duty to maintain it, as it did not own, occupy, or possess the property.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the traditional common law rule limiting the liability of landowners for defects on adjacent public property they do not control. It narrowly construes the 'affirmative act' exception, clarifying that activities merely attracting pedestrians to an area, like a yard sale, are insufficient to create a duty of care regarding the public sidewalk. For homeowners' associations, the ruling underscores that their duties are strictly defined by their covenants, shielding them from liability for areas not explicitly designated as 'common areas.' This provides a strong precedent for defendants in similar premises liability cases involving public ways.
Unlock the full brief for Brooks v. Seaton Place Homeowners Ass'n