Lexplug logoLexplug

Breiner v. Nevada Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 13933, 610 F.3d 1202, 93 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,930 (2010)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

An employer's facially discriminatory hiring policy is not excused as having a 'de minimis' impact simply because other promotional opportunities exist, nor can it be justified as a Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (BFOQ) based on generalized gender stereotypes or as a remedy for correctable employee misconduct.


Facts:

  • In 2003, an investigation at the Southern Nevada Women’s Correctional Facility (SNWCF), then operated by a private company, revealed an inmate had been impregnated by a male guard.
  • The investigation uncovered an 'uninhibited sexual environment' with widespread sexual relationships between staff and inmates, contraband smuggling, and a lack of effective supervision.
  • After the private operator terminated its contract, the Nevada Department of Corrections (NDOC) resumed control of SNWCF under intense political and media pressure.
  • NDOC Director Jackie Crawford implemented a new staffing plan that included a policy to hire only women for the three correctional lieutenant positions, which are senior shift supervisors.
  • The official job posting for the correctional lieutenant positions at SNWCF specified that 'only female applicants will be accepted.'
  • Randy Stout, a male correctional sergeant who was qualified for the lieutenant position, was deterred from applying for a role at SNWCF because of the female-only policy.
  • Stout specifically desired a position at SNWCF because its location would have allowed him to avoid selling his house and having his wife quit her job.

Procedural Posture:

  • Randy Stout and other male correctional officers filed charges with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
  • After receiving a right-to-sue notice, the officers filed a lawsuit against the Nevada Department of Corrections (NDOC) in the U.S. District Court, a federal trial court.
  • The plaintiffs alleged that NDOC's female-only hiring policy for correctional lieutenants violated Title VII.
  • The district court granted summary judgment in favor of NDOC, upholding the policy.
  • The plaintiffs (appellants) appealed the district court's decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does the Nevada Department of Corrections' policy of hiring only female correctional lieutenants at a women's prison violate Title VII's prohibition on sex discrimination?


Opinions:

Majority - Berzon, Circuit Judge

Yes, the Nevada Department of Corrections' policy violates Title VII. The denial of a specific promotional opportunity is an actionable harm under Title VII and cannot be dismissed as 'de minimis' simply because other opportunities may exist within the larger organization. Furthermore, the gender-based hiring restriction is not a Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (BFOQ) because it is based on invidious gender stereotypes rather than objective, verifiable job requirements. The court rejected NDOC's arguments that men were inherently incapable of supervising a women's prison, that they would condone or commit sexual abuse, and that women possessed a unique 'innate ability' to manage female inmates. The court reasoned that the prior problems at the prison stemmed from employee misconduct and poor management, which must be addressed through non-discriminatory means like improved training, supervision, and discipline, not by categorically excluding an entire gender from supervisory roles.



Analysis:

This case significantly narrows the application of the Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (BFOQ) exception in the context of correctional facilities. It establishes that an employer cannot justify a gender-based hiring ban as a BFOQ by citing past employee misconduct or relying on broad, unsubstantiated stereotypes about the abilities of men and women. The decision clarifies that the BFOQ defense is unavailable when the underlying problem is poor management or employee behavior that can be corrected through non-discriminatory alternatives. This precedent strengthens Title VII protections by requiring employers, even in high-stakes environments like prisons, to focus on individualized assessments and objective qualifications rather than discriminatory shortcuts.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Breiner v. Nevada Department of Corrections (2010) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for Breiner v. Nevada Department of Corrections