Boone v. Top Dollar Pawn Shop of Bossier, LLC
2016 La. App. LEXIS 329, 188 So. 3d 1093, 2016 WL 740297 (2016)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A pawnbroker is statutorily liable for the replacement value of pledged items lost while in its care, custody, and control, upon the pledgor's attempt to pay the full amount due. Appellate courts afford great deference to trial court findings regarding valuation and expert witness fees, upholding them unless clearly wrong or a manifest abuse of discretion.
Facts:
- In June 2013, Betty Boone made a loan of $425 with Top Dollar Pawn Shop, pledging specific jewelry including cluster diamonds, a gold rope bracelet, and a tanzanite ring.
- On September 16, 2013, Betty Boone made a second loan of $500 with Top Dollar Pawn Shop, pledging additional jewelry described as scrap gold pieces, gold rings, and a gold necklace.
- Some of the pledged jewelry held significant sentimental value for Betty Boone, having belonged to her deceased husband and passed down to her.
- Betty Boone made payments and interest on the first loan and attempted to retrieve the pledged jewelry, but Top Dollar Pawn Shop informed her that it was no longer at the shop.
- Top Dollar Pawn Shop subsequently froze the second loan and refused further payment from Betty Boone because the jewelry pledged for that loan could also not be found.
- Mr. Ralph Forrester, an expert in jewelry appraisals and gemology,, opined that the replacement value of the lost jewelry was $27,500 and the fair market value was $19,300, basing his opinion on conversations with Betty Boone, photographs, market knowledge, and contacts with other jewelers.
Procedural Posture:
- Betty Boone filed suit against Top Dollar Pawn Shop of Bossier, LLC, in a state trial court to recover the value of her missing jewelry.
- A trial was held in the trial court, where Betty Boone presented testimony regarding the loss of her jewelry and an expert testified regarding its value.
- The trial court orally ruled that Top Dollar Pawn Shop was liable to Betty Boone for the loss of the jewelry.
- The trial court ordered post-trial briefs from both parties concerning the amount of damages due to Betty Boone.
- After reviewing the briefs, the trial court rendered a judgment in favor of Betty Boone for $14,000 for the replacement of the jewelry and $1,175 for expert witness fees.
- Top Dollar Pawn Shop appealed the trial court's judgment to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.
- Betty Boone answered the appeal, seeking an increase in the damages awarded to either $27,500 or $19,300.
- After the appeal was filed, Top Dollar Pawn Shop filed an exception of no right of action with the appellate court, arguing Betty Boone did not own all the pledged jewelry.
- The Court of Appeal referred the exception of no right of action to the merits of the appeal.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a pawnbroker owe the replacement value of pledged jewelry lost while in its custody when the pledgor attempts to pay off the loans, and did the trial court err in its valuation of the lost jewelry and the award of expert witness fees?
Opinions:
Majority - Pitman, J.
Yes, a pawnbroker is liable for the replacement value of lost pledged jewelry, and the trial court did not err in its valuation of the lost jewelry or the award of expert witness fees. The court first addressed Top Dollar Pawn Shop's exception of no right of action, finding it without merit. Betty Boone clearly owned the jewelry at the time of the pledge, having received it from her deceased husband or son, despite its absence from her husband's succession list. Louisiana Civil Code Articles 3151 and 3152 affirm that ownership is a prerequisite for pledging but that a pledge is established if the pledgor later acquires ownership. On the merits, the court affirmed the trial court's judgment, citing La. R.S. 37:1804(9), which mandates that a pawnbroker must return or replace lost pledged items upon payment of the full amount due. The statute defines 'lost pledged things' to include items that disappeared while in the pawnbroker's custody and limits liability to replacement or replacement value. The court found that Betty Boone met her burden of proof by showing she attempted to pay off both loans but was prevented from doing so due to the lost jewelry. The appellate court found no manifest error in the trial court's acceptance of Mr. Forrester as an expert, his valuation methodology, or his conclusions, especially given that the pawnbroker's negligence made physical appraisal impossible. Documents used by the expert were admitted as tools for valuation, not for the truth of their content. Finally, the court found no abuse of discretion in the trial court's award of $1,175 for expert witness fees, considering the work required to evaluate missing property and the trial court's broad discretion in setting such fees.
Analysis:
This case establishes a clear precedent regarding a pawnbroker's statutory liability for lost pledged items, emphasizing that the obligation extends to the replacement value, not merely the loan amount. It reinforces the significant deference appellate courts grant to trial courts in determining factual matters, particularly concerning damages and expert testimony. The decision is notable for upholding expert valuations even when direct physical examination of the lost items is impossible, acknowledging that the defendant's negligence may necessitate alternative, yet still credible, appraisal methods. This may impact future cases involving lost or destroyed unique property in bailment situations, guiding courts on the admissibility and weight of expert testimony under challenging evidentiary circumstances.
