Lexplug logoLexplug

Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas

Supreme Court of United States
489 U.S. 538 (1989)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

An offense with a maximum authorized prison term of six months or less is presumed to be a 'petty' offense for which the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial does not apply. A defendant can only overcome this presumption by demonstrating that additional statutory penalties are so severe that they clearly reflect a legislative determination that the offense is a 'serious' one.


Facts:

  • Melvin R. Blanton and Mark D. Fraley were charged in separate incidents with driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) in North Las Vegas, Nevada.
  • Neither Blanton nor Fraley had any prior DUI convictions.
  • Under the applicable Nevada statute, a first-time DUI offense was punishable by a maximum term of six months' imprisonment.
  • The statute also mandated additional penalties for a first-time offense, including a fine between $200 and $1,000, a 90-day driver's license suspension, and mandatory attendance at an alcohol abuse education course.
  • As an alternative to imprisonment, a trial court could order the defendant to perform 48 hours of community service while wearing distinctive clothing identifying them as a DUI offender.

Procedural Posture:

  • Petitioners Blanton and Fraley were separately charged with DUI in the North Las Vegas Municipal Court, a trial court.
  • Both petitioners made pretrial demands for a jury trial, which were denied by the municipal court.
  • On appeal to the Eighth Judicial District Court, an intermediate appellate court, Blanton's request was denied, while Fraley's request was granted.
  • Blanton appealed the denial to the Supreme Court of Nevada (the state's highest court), and the city of North Las Vegas appealed the granting of Fraley's request to the same court.
  • The Supreme Court of Nevada consolidated the cases and held that the Federal Constitution does not guarantee a jury trial for a first-time DUI offense in Nevada.
  • The petitioners, Blanton and Fraley, successfully petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does the Sixth Amendment guarantee a right to a trial by jury for a first-offense DUI charge under a Nevada statute that authorizes a maximum prison term of six months but also imposes other non-incarceration penalties?


Opinions:

Majority - Justice Marshall

No, the Sixth Amendment does not guarantee a right to a jury trial for this offense. While the Sixth Amendment provides a right to a jury trial for serious offenses, there is a category of 'petty' offenses to which the right does not apply. The most relevant criterion for distinguishing between serious and petty offenses is the severity of the maximum authorized penalty, with primary emphasis on the maximum period of incarceration. An offense carrying a maximum prison term of six months or less is presumed to be 'petty.' To overcome this presumption, a defendant must show that any additional statutory penalties are so severe that they reflect a legislative intent to treat the offense as 'serious.' In this case, the additional penalties under Nevada's DUI statute—a fine up to $1,000, a 90-day license suspension, community service in special attire, and mandatory education courses—are not severe enough, individually or collectively, to overcome the presumption that a first-offense DUI is a petty offense.



Analysis:

This case solidifies the six-month incarceration period as the primary benchmark for determining whether an offense is 'petty' or 'serious' for Sixth Amendment jury trial purposes. It establishes a strong presumption that offenses with a maximum sentence of six months or less do not require a jury trial. The decision creates a clear, though not absolute, standard for lower courts, focusing their analysis on objective statutory penalties rather than subjective views of an offense's gravity. By setting a high bar for what constitutes 'severe' additional penalties, the ruling ensures that jury trials are reserved for genuinely serious crimes, promoting efficiency in the adjudication of minor offenses.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas (1989) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas