Better Home Plastics Corporation v. United States
119 F.3d 969, 19 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1362, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 17629 (1997)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
When classifying a multi-component set of goods under the "essential character" test of General Rule of Interpretation 3(b), the determination is based on a holistic balancing of all facts, where the indispensable function of one component is a significant, but not solely determinative, factor.
Facts:
- Better Home Plastics imports and sells inexpensive shower curtain sets.
- Each set is comprised of three components: an outer textile curtain, an inner plastic liner, and plastic hooks.
- The outer textile curtain is decorative and semi-transparent, allowing the liner's color to show through.
- The inner plastic liner is opaque, prevents water from escaping the shower, protects the textile curtain from mildew, and contributes to the set's decorative and privacy functions.
- The hooks are used to attach both the curtain and liner to a shower rod.
- The sets are sold to discount stores for $5-$6 and retail to consumers for $9-$12.
Procedural Posture:
- U.S. Customs classified imported shower curtain sets under the tariff subheading for the textile curtain (6303.92.000), applying the default rule of GRI 3(c).
- The importer, Better Home Plastics, filed a suit in the U.S. Court of International Trade, a trial-level court, challenging the classification.
- The Court of International Trade ruled in favor of Better Home Plastics, finding that the plastic liner provided the 'essential character' and ordered reclassification under its subheading (3924.90.1010).
- The United States (appellant) appealed the decision of the Court of International Trade to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Under General Rule of Interpretation 3(b) of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, is the 'essential character' of a multi-component shower curtain set determined by the plastic liner, which performs the indispensable function of water containment, or by the textile curtain?
Opinions:
Majority - Rich, J.
Yes, the 'essential character' of the shower curtain set is determined by its plastic liner. This conclusion is reached not solely because of the liner's indispensable water-containment function, but through a reasoned balancing of all relevant factors. The court found that Customs' classifications are not entitled to special deference in this context and reviewed the legal question de novo. The Court of International Trade correctly applied the 'essential character' test from GRI 3(b). Its decision was based on a combination of factors: the liner's indispensable function of water containment, its protective and privacy functions, its decorative contribution, and the low cost of the overall set. The court did not err by considering 'indispensability' as one factor among many, rather than the sole determinative one. Because the essential character could be determined under GRI 3(b), it was proper to not resort to the default rule of GRI 3(c).
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the application of the 'essential character' test under GRI 3(b) for classifying composite goods for tariff purposes. It establishes that while a component's indispensable function is a highly significant factor, it is not dispositive on its own. The ruling mandates a holistic, fact-based inquiry that balances a component's utilitarian, decorative, and protective functions alongside economic factors like cost. This flexible, multi-factor approach moves away from rigid, single-factor tests and provides a precedential framework for future classification disputes involving goods sold in sets.
