Berrey v. Jeffcoat
785 P.2d 20, 1990 Alas. LEXIS 3, 1990 WL 983 (1990)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A lease provision making a tenant responsible for general repairs of the leased premises does not extend to problems originating in common areas outside the premises that are under the landlord's control. A tenant who justifiably withholds rent due to the landlord's breach of duty to repair is not in default and may validly exercise an option to renew the lease.
Facts:
- In December 1984, David Berrey leased commercial space for a restaurant from Samuel and Phylene Jeffcoat for a one-year term.
- The lease contained a renewal option requiring 90 days' written notice, with the rent for the new term to be renegotiated.
- Berrey exercised the option to renew for 1986 and installed equipment and improvements.
- On May 14, 1986, Berrey gave Jeffcoat written notice of ongoing heat and sewer problems, which originated in areas of the building outside of his leased space.
- Berrey did not pay rent for June 1986, but subsequently paid, and Jeffcoat accepted, rent for July, August, September, and October 1986.
- On August 29, 1986, Jeffcoat sent Berrey a notice of default for the unpaid June rent.
- On September 12, 1986, Berrey provided written notice to Jeffcoat of his intent to renew the lease for another year.
- Jeffcoat's attorney responded that the lease was in default but that Jeffcoat would consider renewal if Berrey paid the back rent plus a 10% rent increase.
Procedural Posture:
- On October 2, 1986, Jeffcoat filed a complaint for forcible entry and detainer (FED) and unpaid rent against Berrey in district court.
- The district court dismissed Jeffcoat's complaint on November 3, 1986, due to improper notice.
- Jeffcoat filed a second FED complaint on February 20, 1987, later adding a claim for six months of back rent.
- The district court held a trial on the possession issue and, on March 3, 1987, ruled that Berrey had no right to possession and ordered him to vacate the premises.
- Berrey subsequently filed an amended answer with a fourteen-count counterclaim against Jeffcoat.
- The case was removed to the superior court because the value of the counterclaims exceeded the district court's jurisdictional limit.
- The superior court granted Jeffcoat's motion for partial summary judgment, entering a judgment against Berrey for unpaid rent and dismissing seven of his counterclaims.
- Berrey (appellant) appeals the superior court's order granting summary judgment to Jeffcoat (appellee).
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Is a tenant's exercise of a lease renewal option invalid when the tenant is in arrears on rent, if the rent was withheld due to the landlord's alleged failure to repair problems originating outside the leased premises?
Opinions:
Majority - Matthews, Chief Justice
No. A tenant's exercise of a lease renewal option is not invalid simply because the tenant has withheld rent, provided the withholding was justified by the landlord's failure to fulfill their obligations. The lease provision requiring the tenant to perform 'general repairs of the premises' cannot be reasonably interpreted to cover off-premises issues like a central heating system or sewage lines serving upper floors, as these are common areas under the landlord's control. If Jeffcoat's failure to address these issues rendered the property unsuitable, Berrey's withholding of rent may have been justified under the Restatement (Second) of Property. If the withholding was justified, Berrey was not in default when he attempted to renew, making his renewal effective. Furthermore, the failure to agree on a new rental amount is not a bar to renewal, as a court can determine a reasonable rent if the parties cannot agree.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the modern legal trend of imposing a non-delegable duty on landlords to maintain common areas in a safe and usable condition, limiting the scope of general tenant-repair clauses to the demised premises. It establishes that a tenant's right to exercise a contractual option, such as renewal, is not automatically forfeited by the tenant's use of a self-help remedy like rent withholding. The ruling ensures that a tenant's valid claim for breach of the landlord's duties must be resolved before determining whether the tenant is in default, preventing landlords from using a tenant's justified non-payment as a pretext to terminate a lease.
Unlock the full brief for Berrey v. Jeffcoat