Lexplug logoLexplug

Beninati v. Black Rock City, LLC

California Court of Appeal
175 Cal. App. 4th 650, 2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1072, 96 Cal. Rptr. 3d 105 (2009)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

The doctrine of primary assumption of risk bars a plaintiff's negligence claim when the injury results from a risk that is inherent in, obvious to, and necessary for the recreational or cultural activity, thereby negating any duty of care owed by the activity's organizer.


Facts:

  • Anthony Beninati was a three-time attendee of the Burning Man festival, an annual weeklong event held in a remote desert location.
  • The culmination of the festival is the burning of a 60-foot-tall wooden effigy, after which attendees are known to approach the bonfire to throw in mementos.
  • Beninati's friend had died six weeks prior to the 2005 festival, and he intended to place a photograph of his deceased friend into the bonfire as a memorial.
  • Beninati acknowledged he knew fire was dangerous and that approaching the massive bonfire posed a risk of being burned.
  • After the effigy had fallen and while the fire was still burning, Beninati walked toward the embers to place his friend's photograph in the fire.
  • After depositing the photograph, he took a few more steps, tripped on something hidden by the ash and embers, and fell into the fire twice, severely burning both of his hands.
  • No one affiliated with the festival organizer, Black Rock, told Beninati it was safe to approach the fire or encouraged him to do so.

Procedural Posture:

  • Anthony Beninati filed a negligence complaint against Black Rock City, LLC in the San Francisco County Superior Court (trial court).
  • Black Rock filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing it owed no duty of care under the doctrine of primary assumption of risk.
  • The trial court granted Black Rock's motion for summary judgment.
  • Beninati, as the appellant, appealed the trial court's judgment to the California Court of Appeal.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does the doctrine of primary assumption of risk bar a negligence claim against the organizer of a festival when a participant is injured by a risk inherent in the activity, such as being burned after voluntarily approaching a large bonfire?


Opinions:

Majority - Ruvolo, P. J.

Yes, the doctrine of primary assumption of risk bars the negligence claim. Under this doctrine, an organizer owes no legal duty to protect a participant from a particular risk of harm that is inherent in the nature of the activity. The court reasoned that the primary assumption of risk doctrine is not limited to sports and applies to other activities involving inherent risks that cannot be eliminated without altering the fundamental nature of the activity, citing the 'firefighter's rule' from Knight v. Jewett as an example. The risk of falling and being burned by flames or embers, including tripping on unseen debris like collapsed support cables, is an inherent, obvious, and necessary part of the Burning Man commemorative ritual. Beninati voluntarily participated in this activity with full awareness of the general risks involved. Furthermore, Beninati failed to produce any evidence that Black Rock increased the inherent risks of the activity, such as by designing the effigy in a uniquely dangerous way that was not fundamental to the event itself.



Analysis:

This decision significantly clarifies that the primary assumption of risk doctrine is not confined to organized sports but extends to unique recreational and cultural activities. By applying the doctrine to the Burning Man festival, the court established a precedent that limits the liability of organizers for events where inherent dangers are part of the core experience. This case will influence future litigation involving injuries at unconventional events, requiring courts to analyze the nature of the activity and whether the risk causing the injury is integral to it. It reinforces that if a risk cannot be eliminated without fundamentally altering the activity, the organizer owes no duty to protect voluntary participants from that risk.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Beninati v. Black Rock City, LLC (2009) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for Beninati v. Black Rock City, LLC