Belt v. Hamilton Nat. Bank
108 F. Supp. 689 (1952)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An individual has a legally protectable property right in a novel idea that has been reduced to a concrete form. When such an idea is disclosed to another with the expectation of compensation, the originator can recover damages on a theory of quasi-contract if the idea is appropriated and used without payment.
Facts:
- Plaintiff, an advertising professional, conceived of an idea for a radio program featuring talented school children, to be sponsored by a business but controlled by local school authorities.
- Plaintiff presented his concept to an officer of the Hamilton National Bank, explicitly stating that he expected compensation if the bank adopted the proposal.
- The bank hired the plaintiff to do preparatory work for $25 per week under an agreement that allowed cancellation with two weeks' notice.
- After two weeks, the bank terminated the plaintiff's employment without providing the contractually required two weeks' notice.
- Several months later, after receiving approval from school authorities, the Hamilton National Bank launched the radio program based on the plaintiff's idea.
- The bank engaged a different advertising agency to produce the program, which ran weekly for over a year and was announced as being sponsored by the bank.
Procedural Posture:
- The plaintiff sued the Hamilton National Bank in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to recover damages for wrongful appropriation of an idea.
- The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $3,300.
- The defendant, Hamilton National Bank, then filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, asking the trial court judge to overrule the jury's decision.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does an individual have a protectable property right in a novel and concrete idea, allowing recovery when it is appropriated by another after being disclosed with an expectation of payment?
Opinions:
Majority - Holtzoff, J.
Yes. An individual has a protectable property right in a novel idea that is reduced to a concrete form. The court reasoned that the common law is not static and must evolve to meet the changing needs of society, similar to its recent recognition of rights like privacy. While an abstract idea is not property, an idea becomes a protectable property right when it is novel and rendered in a concrete, detailed form. Citing precedents like Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. Meyer, the court held that recovery for the appropriation of such an idea can be based on a theory of quasi-contract, especially when the idea was disclosed under circumstances indicating that compensation was expected. The court rejected the defendant's argument that disclosure constituted a publication that abandoned the idea, stating that such a rule would make it impossible to ever sell an idea.
Analysis:
This decision is significant for extending property law principles to cover ideas that do not qualify for traditional patent or copyright protection. It establishes that a quasi-contractual or tort remedy is available for the 'misappropriation of an idea,' provided the idea is novel and concrete. The ruling provides a legal framework for creators to pitch their concepts to businesses with some protection against appropriation, shifting some risk to companies that receive and later use such unsolicited ideas. This precedent helps bridge the gap in intellectual property law, offering protection for the commercial value of creative concepts themselves.
Unlock the full brief for Belt v. Hamilton Nat. Bank