Bein v. Brechtel-Jochim Group, Inc.
92 Daily Journal DAR 7229, 8 Cal. Rptr. 2d 351, 6 Cal. App. 4th 1387 (1992)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Substitute service of process on a gate guard of a private, gated community is valid where the guard controls access to the defendant's residence or place of business, as the guard may be considered a 'competent member of the household' or a 'person apparently in charge.'
Facts:
- Robert Bein and William Frost & Associates (Bein) entered into written contracts with Brechtel-Jochim Group, Inc. for engineering work.
- After Bein completed the work, Brechtel-Jochim Group, Inc. and its sole shareholders, the Brechtels and the Jochims, refused to pay.
- The Brechtels' residence, which also served as the business address, was located within a private, gated community.
- A process server attempted to personally serve the Brechtels and the corporation at their residence on three separate occasions.
- On each attempt, a guard stationed at the community's entrance denied the process server physical access to the property.
Procedural Posture:
- Robert Bein and William Frost & Associates sued Brechtel-Jochim Group, Inc., the Brechtels, and the Jochims in a California trial court for breach of contract.
- After Bein's process server effectuated substitute service, the defendants failed to file a responsive pleading.
- Bein requested and the trial court entered a default judgment against all defendants.
- The defendants (appellants) appealed the default judgment to the California Court of Appeal, arguing the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction because of improper service.
- Bein is the respondent on appeal.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does substitute service of a summons and complaint upon a guard at the entrance of a gated community satisfy the statutory requirements for service on a resident or a business located within that community?
Opinions:
Majority - Sonenshine, J.
Yes, substitute service of process upon a gate guard of a gated community is valid under these circumstances. Service of process statutes are to be liberally construed to effectuate service and uphold jurisdiction, especially when a defendant has received actual notice. When residents of a gated community authorize a guard to control access to their property, that guard becomes a 'competent member of the household' and a 'person apparently in charge' for the purposes of substitute service. A defendant cannot be permitted to defeat service by using a gate guard or other physical barrier to render personal delivery impossible, as the relationship between the resident and the guard makes it more likely than not that the process will be delivered to the named party.
Analysis:
This decision adapts traditional service of process rules to the modern reality of gated communities, which were becoming increasingly common. It establishes a significant California precedent by clarifying that physical barriers erected for privacy and security cannot be used as a shield to evade legal obligations. The ruling reinforces the judicial policy of liberally construing service statutes to ensure that cases can be decided on their merits, preventing defendants from defeating jurisdiction through physical inaccessibility. This case provides clear guidance for process servers dealing with restricted-access properties and signals to residents that they cannot control who may serve them with process simply by choosing a secured abode.
