Barton v. Mitchell Co.
507 So. 2d 148, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1173 (1987)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A landlord's failure to remedy substantial, ongoing noise from an adjacent tenant, after receiving notice and having the ability to control the disturbance, constitutes a breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment and amounts to a constructive eviction, relieving the aggrieved tenant of their obligation to pay rent after vacating the premises.
Facts:
- Elaine Marie Barton entered into a five-year lease with The Mitchell Company on November 1, 1982, to operate a retail patio furniture store in a shopping center.
- In late 1984, The Mitchell Company leased an adjacent space to Body Electric, an exercise studio.
- Body Electric's operations generated loud music, screams, and shouts that caused Barton's walls to vibrate and made it nearly impossible for her to conduct her business.
- The noise from Body Electric resulted in Barton losing customers and salespersons.
- From late 1984 until August 1985, Barton repeatedly complained to The Mitchell Company about the excessive noise.
- The Mitchell Company acknowledged the issue and promised to remedy it, such as by insulating the walls, but took no corrective action.
- On August 3, 1985, after months of the landlord's inaction, Barton vacated the leased premises.
Procedural Posture:
- The Mitchell Company sued Elaine Marie Barton in a Florida trial court to recover unpaid rent for the remainder of her lease term after she vacated the property.
- The trial court, after a non-jury trial, entered a judgment in favor of the landlord, The Mitchell Company, for $18,929.57.
- Elaine Marie Barton, as appellant, appealed the trial court's judgment to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
- The Mitchell Company is the appellee in the appeal.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a landlord constructively evict a commercial tenant, thereby breaching the covenant of quiet enjoyment, by failing to take action against an adjacent tenant creating excessive noise that renders the premises unsuitable for the tenant's business purposes?
Opinions:
Majority - Walden, J.
Yes, the landlord's failure to remedy the excessive noise constituted a constructive eviction. A landlord breaches the covenant of quiet enjoyment when its inaction allows a condition to persist that renders the leased premises unsuitable for their intended purpose. A constructive eviction occurs when a tenant is essentially deprived of the beneficial enjoyment of the property. In this case, the landlord was repeatedly notified of the extreme noise from the adjacent tenant, which severely impacted Barton's business. The landlord had the authority to enforce lease provisions against the noisy tenant and had the ability to make physical changes, like insulating the walls, but failed to do anything over a period of many months. The court rejected the landlord's reliance on an exculpatory clause disclaiming liability for the acts of other tenants, reasoning that Barton was not suing for damages but asserting constructive eviction as a defense to the landlord's claim for rent. Because the landlord's inaction effectively forced Barton out, she was constructively evicted and is not liable for rent after the date she vacated.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the principle that a landlord's duty under the covenant of quiet enjoyment is not merely passive but can require affirmative action to control the conduct of other tenants. It establishes that an exculpatory clause, which might protect a landlord from a suit for damages, does not necessarily defeat a tenant's claim of constructive eviction used as a defense for non-payment of rent. The ruling empowers tenants by holding landlords responsible for maintaining a peaceable environment when they possess the means to do so, particularly in a commercial context where the suitability of the premises is crucial for business operations.
