Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. Glen
411 P.2d 921, 64 Cal. 2d 327, 49 Cal. Rptr. 825 (1966)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A corporate officer breaches their fiduciary duty by engaging in a course of conduct to assist a competitor in recruiting the corporation's employees, which includes misrepresenting threats to the corporation, using confidential salary information to the competitor's advantage, and actively participating in the solicitation effort while still employed. A competitor who knowingly participates in and benefits from the officer's breach is liable for unfair competition.
Facts:
- Judson B. Glen, president of Bancroft-Whitney Company, a lawbook publisher, became dissatisfied with his employment and entered into negotiations with a competitor, Matthew Bender & Co. (Bender Co.), to head a new western division.
- While still president of Bancroft-Whitney, Glen began discussing with Bender Co. the possibility of bringing a dozen or more of Bancroft-Whitney's editors to the new enterprise.
- When the president of Bancroft-Whitney's parent company, Gosnell, inquired about a potential raid on employees, Glen concealed his activities and falsely assured Gosnell that he would report any such threat immediately.
- During this time, Gosnell proposed salary increases to retain editors, but Glen persuaded him to implement the raises in two stages, delaying the second stage until after Glen and the other employees planned to have resigned, thus undermining the raises' purpose.
- Glen provided Bender Co. with a confidential list of 56 Bancroft-Whitney editors, their specific salaries, and his personal assessments to facilitate a targeted recruitment campaign.
- Glen, along with Bender, held a secret meeting in Carmel with key Bancroft-Whitney managers (while they were still employed) to select which of their colleagues to solicit and to determine salary offers.
- Following the plan, a Bender Co. representative, guided by Glen, successfully solicited numerous editors, leading to the mass resignation of Glen and over 15 other key employees on December 15, 1961.
Procedural Posture:
- Bancroft-Whitney Company filed suit against its former president, Judson B. Glen, and a competitor, Matthew Bender & Co., in a California state trial court.
- The complaint alleged breach of fiduciary duty and unfair competition.
- Following a bench trial (a trial by a judge without a jury), the trial court found in favor of the defendants on all counts.
- The trial court entered a judgment holding that Glen did not breach his fiduciary duties and that the other defendants were not guilty of unfair competition.
- Bancroft-Whitney Company (plaintiff) appealed the trial court's judgment to the Supreme Court of California.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a corporate president breach his fiduciary duty when, while still employed, he actively assists a competitor in soliciting his corporation's key employees by providing confidential salary information, misleading his own company about the competitive threat, and participating in the recruitment planning and execution?
Opinions:
Majority - Mosk, J.
Yes, a corporate president breaches his fiduciary duty under these circumstances. Corporate officers owe a duty of 'the most scrupulous observance' to their corporation, which requires them not only to protect the corporation's interests but also to refrain from any act that would injure it. While an officer may make preparations to compete before resigning, the nature of those preparations is critical. Here, Glen's actions went far beyond mere preparation. His conduct constituted a consistent course designed to harm Bancroft-Whitney for the benefit of a competitor. Key breaches included: 1) deliberately misleading his superior, Gosnell, about the raid by Bender Co.; 2) sabotaging the company's defensive salary increases by suggesting a two-step implementation, knowing it would be ineffective; 3) disclosing confidential salary information to facilitate targeted solicitations; and 4) actively assisting in the recruitment of his own company's employees. These acts, taken in combination, demonstrated a flagrant breach of his fiduciary duty. Because Bender and Bender Co. were aware of, cooperated in, and reaped the benefits of Glen's breach, they are liable for unfair competition.
Analysis:
This case clarifies the boundary between permissible preparations to compete and an actionable breach of fiduciary duty by a corporate officer. It establishes that liability is not based on a single act, such as seeking new employment, but on a 'course of conduct' that involves deception, misuse of confidential information, and active solicitation of co-workers while still employed. The ruling solidifies the principle that an officer's duty of loyalty prohibits them from surreptitiously dismantling their current employer for the benefit of a future one. Furthermore, it affirms that third parties who knowingly participate in and benefit from such a breach are also liable, strengthening protections for corporations against faithless fiduciaries and predatory competitors.
Unlock the full brief for Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. Glen