Baker v. Comm'r
118 T.C. 452, 118 T.C. No. 28, 2002 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 28 (2002)
Rule of Law:
A termination payment received by an insurance agent upon retirement from an insurance company is taxable as ordinary income, not capital gain, when the agent does not own or sell capital assets or the underlying business to which goodwill attaches, and a portion of the payment is for a covenant not to compete.
Facts:
- Warren L. Baker, Jr. began working with State Farm Insurance Cos. as an independent contractor agent on January 19, 1963, establishing his own agency and developing a customer base.
- Baker entered into an agent’s agreement with State Farm on March 1, 1977, which explicitly stated that all information regarding policyholders (names, addresses, insured property, expiration dates) and all forms and materials related to that information were the sole property and trade secrets of State Farm.
- The agreement required Baker to return all State Farm property, including manuals, forms, records, supplies, computer, and customer lists, within 10 days of termination.
- The agreement included a covenant not to compete, obligating Baker for one year post-termination not to induce State Farm policyholders to cancel coverage or solicit them for competitive insurance.
- The agreement also provided for a termination payment to Baker if he met certain conditions, with the amount calculated as a percentage of policies that remained in force or had been in force for the 12 months preceding termination.
- Baker retired and terminated his relationship with State Farm on February 28, 1997, holding approximately 4,000 policies from 1,800 households and fully complying with the provision to return all State Farm property.
- Approximately 90 percent of Baker's existing policies were assigned to a successor agent, who also hired Baker's two employees and assumed his telephone number.
- Petitioners reported the $38,622 termination payment received in 1997 as long-term capital gain on their Federal income tax return, describing it as a sale of 'personally produced policies and other intangible assets' and indicating a covenant not to compete without assigning it value.
Procedural Posture:
- Respondent (Commissioner of Internal Revenue) determined a deficiency in petitioners' Federal income tax of $2,519 for 1997.
- Petitioners (Warren L. Baker, Jr. and his spouse) timely filed their 1997 Federal income tax return, reporting the termination payment as long-term capital gain.
- Petitioners attached Form 8594, Asset Acquisition Statement Under Section 1060, to their tax return, indicating a fair market value for a class IV asset and acknowledging a covenant not to compete without assigning a value.
- In a notice of deficiency, respondent determined that the termination payment was ordinary income and did not qualify for capital gain treatment.
- Petitioners filed a petition with the United States Tax Court.
- The Coalition of Exclusive Agent Associations, Inc. (CEAA) filed an amicus brief with leave of the Tax Court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Is a termination payment received by an independent contractor insurance agent upon retirement from State Farm taxable as capital gain or ordinary income for Federal income tax purposes?
Opinions:
Majority - Chief Special Trial Judge Panuthos
No, the termination payment received by petitioner Warren L. Baker, Jr. upon retirement from State Farm is not taxable as capital gain; it is taxable as ordinary income. The court determined that Baker did not sell a capital asset or goodwill because, under the terms of his agent's agreement, all customer information, records, and other assets used in his agency belonged to State Farm. Consequently, Baker did not own the 'vendible business assets' necessary for a sale. The court referenced Schelble v. Commissioner and Foxe v. Commissioner, which established that an agent cannot sell assets, including customer contacts or an organization, that are legally owned by the insurance company. Furthermore, the court found that Baker entered into a covenant not to compete with State Farm, and a portion of the termination payment was paid for this covenant, which is always classified as ordinary income. Since no capital asset was sold or exchanged, the termination payment must be treated as ordinary income.
Analysis:
This case is significant for independent contractor agents in the insurance industry, establishing that termination payments are generally ordinary income rather than capital gain if the agent does not legally own the underlying business assets or customer relationships. It reinforces the importance of contract terms in defining asset ownership and highlights that goodwill cannot be sold in isolation without the associated business. Future cases involving similar agent agreements will likely apply this precedent, scrutinizing whether agents genuinely possessed transferable capital assets or if the payments were merely a substitute for future income or for a non-compete agreement.
