Bader v. Kramer
484 F.3d 666 (2007)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under the Hague Convention, a parent with de jure custody rights exercises those rights so long as they maintain any form of regular contact with the child and their actions do not constitute a clear and unequivocal abandonment of the child.
Facts:
- Ulrich Bader and Sonja Kramer were married in Germany and had one child, C.J.B., in 1999, who was a lifelong resident of Germany.
- The couple separated in 2000, and C.J.B. resided with Kramer.
- Bader was incarcerated for weapons violations from November 2000 until his release on December 17, 2002.
- The couple divorced in June 2002, but no court order was issued regarding custody, so under German law, they retained joint parental custody.
- Between his release in December 2002 and April 2003, Bader visited with C.J.B., took her on an eight-day ski vacation, and had her for an overnight stay.
- On April 4, 2003, Kramer picked C.J.B. up from Bader's home and took her to the United States without Bader's knowledge or consent.
Procedural Posture:
- Ulrich Bader filed a petition in U.S. District Court seeking the return of his child to Germany under the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA).
- The district court initially denied the petition, finding that Bader did not have cognizable custody rights.
- Bader (appellant) appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which reversed in a prior decision (Bader I), holding that Bader possessed joint custody rights under German law.
- The Fourth Circuit remanded the case to the district court for a determination of whether Bader was exercising his custody rights and whether any defenses applied.
- On remand, the district court found that Bader was exercising his rights and ordered the child returned to Germany.
- Sonja Kramer (appellant) then appealed that order to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a parent with de jure joint custody rights 'exercise' those rights under the Hague Convention by maintaining regular contact with the child, such as visits and vacations, short of clear and unequivocal abandonment?
Opinions:
Majority - Shedd
Yes. A parent with de jure custody rights exercises those rights under the Hague Convention as long as they have not clearly and unequivocally abandoned the child. The court adopted a liberal standard for finding 'exercise' to avoid making determinations on the merits of a custody dispute, which is reserved for the courts of the child's country of habitual residence. The court reasoned that an inquiry into the quality or sufficiency of a parent's actions would move it 'perilously close' to deciding the underlying custody claim. Therefore, any acts demonstrating a parent has not abandoned the child, such as maintaining regular contact, are sufficient to constitute an 'exercise' of custody rights. In this case, Bader's visits, vacation, and overnight custody of C.J.B. in the months before her removal were more than sufficient to show he had not unequivocally abandoned her and was therefore exercising his joint custody rights.
Analysis:
This decision aligns the Fourth Circuit with other federal circuits by adopting a broad, liberal standard for what constitutes the 'exercise' of custody rights under the Hague Convention. By establishing the 'clear and unequivocal abandonment' test, the court significantly lowers the evidentiary burden for a petitioner seeking a child's return. The ruling reinforces a core principle of the Hague Convention: that its purpose is to restore the pre-abduction status quo and return the child to their country of habitual residence for a custody determination, not for the court in the new country to decide the merits of the custody dispute.
Unlock the full brief for Bader v. Kramer