Lexplug logoLexplug

Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

United States Supreme Court
517 U.S. 781 (1996)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

An employer commits an unfair labor practice by disavowing a collective-bargaining agreement based on a good-faith doubt about a union's majority status, when that doubt arises from facts known to the employer before the union accepted the contract offer.


Facts:

  • Auciello Iron Works, Inc. and its employees' certified representative, Shopmen’s Local No. 501 (Union), were unable to negotiate a new collective-bargaining agreement after their prior one expired.
  • In October 1988, the employees went on strike.
  • On November 17, 1988, Auciello presented the Union with a complete contract proposal.
  • Before the Union responded to the offer, Auciello became aware of facts suggesting the Union had lost majority support, including that 9 employees had crossed the picket line and 13 employees had submitted union resignation forms.
  • On the evening of November 27, 1988, the Union telegraphed its acceptance of Auciello's outstanding contract offer.
  • The next day, Auciello disavowed the agreement, citing its doubt about the Union's majority status based on the information it had acquired before the acceptance.

Procedural Posture:

  • The NLRB's General Counsel issued an administrative complaint against Auciello, charging it with unfair labor practices.
  • An Administrative Law Judge found that Auciello had violated the NLRA.
  • The NLRB affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision and ordered Auciello to honor the contract.
  • The NLRB petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit to enforce its order.
  • The First Circuit initially remanded the case, finding that the NLRB had not adequately explained its reasoning.
  • On remand, the NLRB issued a supplemental opinion justifying its rule.
  • The Court of Appeals for the First Circuit then enforced the NLRB's order.
  • The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does an employer commit an unfair labor practice under the National Labor Relations Act by disavowing a collective-bargaining agreement immediately after its formation, based on a good-faith doubt about the union's majority support that arose from facts known to the employer before the union's acceptance of the contract offer?


Opinions:

Majority - Justice Souter

Yes. An employer may not disavow a collective-bargaining agreement based on a good-faith doubt about a union's majority status if that doubt is based on information known to the employer before the contract was accepted. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) reasonably concluded that allowing such a challenge would undermine the stability of collective-bargaining relationships, which is a primary goal of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). An employer cannot be allowed to 'sit' on its doubt, hold an offer open, and then use that doubt as an escape hatch only after the union accepts. This would give the employer one-sided leverage and encourage bad-faith bargaining. Before the union's acceptance, Auciello had several valid options, such as withdrawing its offer, petitioning for a new representation election, or refusing to bargain further based on its doubt. By failing to act before the contract was formed, Auciello lost its opportunity to raise the issue of the union's majority status.



Analysis:

This decision establishes a bright-line rule that prioritizes the stability of collective-bargaining relationships over an employer's post-formation challenges to a union's status. It effectively prevents employers from using a good-faith doubt as a strategic tool to escape a contract they offered. The ruling solidifies the principle that once an offer is accepted, a conclusive presumption of the union's majority status attaches for the duration of the contract. This forces employers to address any concerns about a union's support before a contract is formed, thereby clarifying the parties' obligations and promoting industrial peace.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (1996) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board