Atkins v. State
923 P.2d 1119, 112 Nev. 1122 (1996)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A conviction for sexual assault under Nevada law requires the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim was a living person at the time of the sexual penetration.
Facts:
- Ebony Mason, who was intoxicated, accompanied Sterling Mark Atkins, Jr., his brother Shawn Atkins, and Anthony Doyle to an apartment.
- Mason engaged in consensual sex with Atkins and Shawn Atkins, but refused to have anal sex with Doyle.
- Doyle then drove the group to a remote desert area in Clark County instead of taking Mason downtown as promised.
- At the remote location, Doyle became angry, stripped Mason of her clothes, and raped her as Atkins and his brother watched.
- Following the rape, both Atkins and Doyle beat and kicked Mason until she died.
- Mason's nude body was later discovered with a four-inch twig protruding from her rectum.
- A medical examination determined Mason died from strangulation and/or blunt force trauma but could not establish whether the twig was inserted before or after her death.
Procedural Posture:
- The State of Nevada charged Sterling Mark Atkins, Jr., Anthony Doyle, and Shawn Atkins with murder, conspiracy, robbery, kidnapping, and sexual assault in a Nevada district court (trial court).
- The State filed a notice of intent to seek the death penalty.
- The district court granted co-defendant Doyle's motion to sever his trial.
- The district court dismissed the robbery count against all defendants.
- Prior to trial, Shawn Atkins accepted a plea bargain, pleading guilty to first-degree murder and kidnapping in exchange for his testimony against Sterling Atkins.
- In a separate trial, a jury convicted co-defendant Doyle on all counts and sentenced him to death.
- Following a jury trial, Sterling Atkins was found guilty of murder, conspiracy to commit murder, first-degree kidnapping, and sexual assault.
- At the conclusion of the penalty phase, the jury sentenced Atkins to death for the murder conviction.
- Atkins (appellant) appealed his conviction and sentence to the Supreme Court of Nevada, arguing against the State of Nevada (appellee).
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a conviction for sexual assault under Nevada law require proof that the victim was alive at the time of the penetration?
Opinions:
Majority - Shearing, J.
Yes, a conviction for sexual assault requires proof that the victim was alive at the time of penetration. The court interpreted the word 'person' in the Nevada sexual assault statute to mean a living human being, reasoning that the existence of a separate necrophilia statute demonstrates the legislature's intent to distinguish between sexual acts on living victims and corpses. Here, the State failed to present sufficient evidence to establish that Mason was alive when the twig was inserted into her rectum. The medical examiner's testimony was inconclusive, and the autopsy revealed no internal trauma associated with the penetration that would indicate she was alive. Therefore, Atkins' conviction for sexual assault must be reversed, while his convictions for murder, conspiracy, and kidnapping are affirmed.
Concurring - Rose, J.
Agreed with the majority's judgment but wrote separately to express concern over prosecutorial misconduct. The prosecutor's closing argument improperly encouraged the jury to render a death verdict to satisfy community expectations, by stating they could 'hold your head up high' and say they 'did justice.' While these remarks were improper, they did not so infect the proceedings with unfairness as to require reversal, given the compelling evidence of guilt for the other crimes.
Concurring-in-part-and-dissenting-in-part - Steffen, C. J.
Dissented from the majority's reversal of the sexual assault conviction, citing reasons articulated in the dissent of the co-defendant's case, Doyle v. State. Concurred with the majority in affirming Atkins' other convictions and the sentence of death.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the legal distinction between sexual assault and necrophilia in Nevada, establishing a clear 'live victim' requirement for sexual assault charges. It underscores the critical role of forensic evidence in proving the temporal relationship between a sexual act and the victim's death. For future cases, this precedent places a significant burden on prosecutors to affirmatively prove the victim was alive during penetration to sustain a sexual assault conviction, potentially leading to different charging decisions when the timing is ambiguous.
Unlock the full brief for Atkins v. State