Associated Hosp. Serv. of Phil. v. Pustilnik
262 Pa. Super. 600, 396 A.2d 1332 (1979)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
When a subrogor settles a tort claim, the settlement amount is conclusively established as full compensation, and the subrogee is entitled to recover the full value of the benefits it provided, less a proportionate share of reasonable attorney's fees and costs.
Facts:
- On May 27, 1968, Alan Pustilnik was injured when struck by a SEPTA subway car.
- Pustilnik incurred hospital bills totaling $30,200.87, of which his insurer, Associated Hospital Service of Philadelphia (Blue Cross), provided a credit for $18,960.18.
- Pustilnik retained attorney Malcolm Waldron and instituted a suit against SEPTA.
- Blue Cross notified Pustilnik and Waldron of its subrogation interest in any recovery.
- Blue Cross offered Waldron a fee of 25-33.3% to represent its interest, which Waldron rejected, demanding 50%. Blue Cross did not agree to the 50% fee.
- During trial, Pustilnik settled his suit with SEPTA for $235,000.
- Blue Cross did not participate in the trial or the settlement negotiations.
Procedural Posture:
- Alan Pustilnik sued SEPTA in a state trial court for personal injuries.
- During the trial, Pustilnik and SEPTA reached a settlement agreement.
- The trial judge placed $30,000 of the settlement proceeds into an escrow fund due to a dispute between Pustilnik and Blue Cross.
- Blue Cross filed the present action in equity in a state trial court to determine its right to the escrowed funds.
- The trial court entered a judgment for Blue Cross for $4,889.49, having made several deductions from Blue Cross's claimed amount.
- Both Pustilnik, as appellant, and Blue Cross, as cross-appellant, appealed the trial court's judgment to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, an intermediate appellate court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Is a subrogee's recovery from a subrogor's settlement with a tortfeasor limited to a pro-rata share when the subrogor claims the settlement was for less than the full value of the injury, and is the subrogee's share of attorney's fees determined by the subrogor's private fee agreement?
Opinions:
Majority - Spaeth
No. A subrogee's recovery from a subrogor's settlement is not limited by the subrogor's claim that the settlement was for less than the full value of the injury, and the subrogee is only obligated to pay a reasonable attorney's fee, not one unilaterally set by the subrogor's contract. The court reasoned that allowing Pustilnik to claim the value of his medical expenses in his suit against SEPTA and then deny that same value to Blue Cross would result in unjust enrichment. Citing precedent, the court held that when a subrogor settles, they waive their right to a judicial determination of their losses and conclusively establish the settlement amount as full compensation for damages. To hold otherwise would encourage unethical practices, such as arguing a strong case for a high settlement and then a weak case to defeat a subrogation claim. Regarding attorney's fees, the court applied the common fund doctrine, holding that where an attorney creates a fund benefiting both subrogor and subrogee, the subrogee is only liable for a proportionate share of a reasonable fee, as determined by the court, not the fee Pustilnik contracted with his attorney.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the principle that a subrogor cannot compromise a subrogee's interest through a settlement and then claim the settlement did not make them whole. It prevents the subrogor from taking inconsistent positions and ensures the subrogee's right to full reimbursement from the recovery. The case also reinforces the 'reasonable fee' standard under the common fund doctrine, protecting subrogees from being bound by high-cost contingency fee agreements to which they were not a party. This strengthens the legal position of insurers in subrogation actions following settlements, making their recovery more predictable and secure.
