Lexplug logoLexplug

Arjona v. Torres

District Court of Appeal of Florida
2006 WL 3019578, 941 So.2d 451 (2006)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

Under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), a court has exclusive jurisdiction to make an initial child custody determination if it is the child's "home state," defined as where the child lived for at least six consecutive months immediately before the proceeding. A simultaneous proceeding in a non-home state court is not considered to be in "substantial conformity" with the UCCJEA, and thus does not require the home state court to stay its proceedings.


Facts:

  • Edgar Ricardo Arjona (Mr. Arjona) and Leslie Torres (Mrs. Arjona) married in 1992 and had two children.
  • The family moved to Mexico in 1992 and then relocated to Miami in 1999.
  • In 2001, Mrs. Arjona and the children returned to Mexico for a reconciliation attempt with Mr. Arjona, who had previously moved back.
  • In August 2002, Mrs. Arjona and the children returned to Miami, where they have resided continuously since.
  • On November 4, 2005, Mr. Arjona filed a renewed petition for dissolution of marriage in Mexico.
  • On December 13, 2005, Mrs. Arjona filed a petition for dissolution of marriage in Florida, which explicitly sought a determination of child custody.
  • Mrs. Arjona served her petition on Mr. Arjona on December 14, 2005, while Mr. Arjona did not serve his Mexican petition on Mrs. Arjona until January 10, 2006.

Procedural Posture:

  • In August 2002, Mrs. Arjona filed a petition for dissolution of marriage in a Florida circuit court (trial court), which was dismissed because she did not meet the six-month residency requirement.
  • In September 2002, Mr. Arjona filed for divorce in Mexico. A Mexican court ultimately denied his petition for divorce in a final judgment that was affirmed on appeal.
  • On November 4, 2005, Mr. Arjona filed a renewed petition for dissolution of marriage in Mexico.
  • On December 13, 2005, Mrs. Arjona filed a new petition for dissolution of marriage in the Florida circuit court.
  • Mr. Arjona filed a motion to dismiss and/or abate the Florida action, arguing the Mexican court had priority because he filed his petition there first.
  • The Florida trial court denied Mr. Arjona's motion, finding that it had jurisdiction over the matter.
  • Mr. Arjona (appellant) filed a non-final appeal of the trial court's order to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. Mrs. Arjona is the appellee.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a Florida court have exclusive jurisdiction to make an initial child custody determination under the UCCJEA when Florida is the children's undisputed "home state," even if a divorce proceeding was filed first in a foreign country where the children do not reside?


Opinions:

Majority - Rothenberg, J.

Yes. A Florida court has exclusive jurisdiction because Florida is the children's "home state." The UCCJEA gives jurisdictional priority to the child's home state for initial custody determinations. Because the children have continuously resided in Florida since 2002, Florida is their home state. Therefore, the Mexican court, not being the home state, lacks jurisdiction substantially in conformity with the UCCJEA. Consequently, the simultaneous proceedings rule, which requires a court to defer to a previously filed action, does not apply, and the Florida court is not required to stay its proceedings or communicate with the Mexican court.



Analysis:

This decision solidifies the primacy of "home state" jurisdiction under the UCCJEA, establishing that it is the exclusive basis for an initial child custody determination. The ruling clarifies that the "first-to-file" principle in simultaneous proceedings is inapplicable unless the first court has a valid jurisdictional basis under the UCCJEA's hierarchy. This prevents a parent from engaging in forum shopping by filing first in a jurisdiction with no recent connection to the child. The case reinforces the UCCJEA's core purpose: to have custody decisions made in the forum with the most evidence concerning the child's care and personal relationships.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Arjona v. Torres (2006) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for Arjona v. Torres