Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.
146 Minn. 430, 1920 Minn. LEXIS 643, 179 N.W. 45 (1920)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A party who wrongfully starts a fire is liable for resulting damage if their fire was a material and substantial factor in causing the loss, even if it merged with another fire of unknown or natural origin that would have been independently sufficient to cause the damage.
Facts:
- A fire, referred to as the 'bog fire,' started in a peat bog near plaintiff's property in northeastern Minnesota during a severe drought in 1918.
- The plaintiff alleged that the bog fire was started by a locomotive engine belonging to the defendant railroad company.
- On October 12, 1918, other fires were also burning to the west and northwest of the plaintiff's property.
- A strong wind, reaching high velocities, swept through the area on that day.
- The bog fire merged with the other fires from the west and northwest, forming a larger, consolidated fire.
- This consolidated fire swept over and destroyed the plaintiff's property.
Procedural Posture:
- Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant railroad company in a state trial court, alleging the defendant's 'bog fire' destroyed his property.
- At trial, the defendant introduced evidence of other fires of unknown origin.
- The plaintiff offered rebuttal evidence suggesting the defendant's engines also started these other fires.
- Both parties moved for a directed verdict; the trial court denied both motions.
- The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.
- After the verdict, the trial court permitted the plaintiff to amend his complaint to allege that both the bog fire and the other fires destroyed his property.
- The defendant appealed the trial court's order to the Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Is a party who started a fire liable for damage to property that was destroyed by the combination of that fire and another fire of no responsible origin, if the first fire was a substantial factor in the destruction, even if the other fire would have been sufficient on its own to cause the damage?
Opinions:
Majority - Author not specified
Yes, a party who started a fire is liable for damage if that fire was a substantial factor in the destruction. The court rejected the defendant's argument, based on the case of Cook v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. Ry. Co., that there is no liability if the defendant's fire combines with another fire of sufficient independent force to cause the damage alone. Instead, the court held that if the defendant's fire was a 'material or substantial element' in causing the plaintiff's loss, the defendant is liable. The court reasoned that a Minnesota statute (G.S. 1913, § 4426) effectively makes railroad companies insurers against damage from fires set by their engines and leaves no room for a rule that would relieve them of liability in such circumstances. Furthermore, the court dismissed the argument that the extraordinary wind was an intervening cause, stating that high winds and drought conditions were foreseeable and that the fire was a material concurring cause without which the damage would not have occurred.
Analysis:
This decision establishes the 'substantial factor' test as the standard for causation in Minnesota for cases involving multiple, concurrent causes, particularly when one cause is of unknown or natural origin. It marks a significant departure from a strict 'but-for' causation analysis, which would absolve a defendant if the harm would have occurred anyway due to an independent, sufficient cause. By adopting the substantial factor test, the court prevents a culpable defendant from escaping liability by pointing to a concurrent force that also contributed to the harm. This precedent broadens tort liability and makes it easier for plaintiffs to recover in complex causation scenarios involving multiple fires or other converging destructive forces.
