Alms v. Baum
343 Ill. App.3d 67, 796 N.E.2d 1123, 277 Ill. Dec. 757 (2003)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, an employer or principal is not vicariously liable for the negligent acts of a volunteer if those acts are committed outside the scope of the volunteer relationship, such as during a personal, social outing after mandatory duties have concluded.
Facts:
- Ronald McDonald House operated a summer camp and required its unpaid volunteer camp leaders, including Daniel Baum, Steven Berger, and Susan Delanty, to attend a mandatory orientation weekend.
- The weekend began with a mandatory meeting on Friday, June 6, 1997, which ended around 9:30 p.m.
- After the meeting concluded, a group of camp leaders, including Baum, Berger, and Delanty, went to a local bar called the Keg Room, a common but unofficial practice.
- Camp leaders were on their own free time after the Friday meeting ended, were responsible for their own transportation, and were not required to stay on camp premises.
- At the Keg Room, Baum drank five beers and socialized for approximately two hours.
- Baum then offered to drive Berger and Delanty back to the camp in his own two-seater sports car.
- Delanty sat on Berger's lap in the single passenger seat.
- While driving back to the camp, Baum lost control of the vehicle and crashed, resulting in Berger's death and Delanty's permanent injuries.
Procedural Posture:
- David Alms (as administrator of Steven Berger's estate) and Susan Delanty filed a lawsuit against Daniel Baum and Ronald McDonald House in a state trial court.
- The plaintiffs' claim against Ronald McDonald House was based on the theory of respondeat superior, alleging the organization was vicariously liable for Baum's actions.
- Ronald McDonald House filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing Baum was not acting as its agent at the time of the accident.
- The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Ronald McDonald House.
- The plaintiffs, Alms and Delanty, appealed the trial court's decision to the intermediate appellate court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the doctrine of respondeat superior impose vicarious liability on a charitable organization for the negligent acts of its volunteer when the volunteer caused an accident while driving from a social gathering after a mandatory work meeting had officially concluded?
Opinions:
Majority - Justice Reid
No, the doctrine of respondeat superior does not impose liability on the charitable organization. An employer is only vicariously liable for the torts of an employee or volunteer committed within the scope of their employment. Here, Baum was not acting within the scope of his duties as a volunteer camp leader at the time of the accident. Official camp business had concluded for the day when the mandatory Friday meeting ended, and the camp leaders were on their own free time. The trip to the Keg Room was a purely social and voluntary activity, not an extension of camp business, and Baum's purpose in going was to socialize, not to serve Ronald McDonald House. Baum's act of drinking at a bar for two hours constituted a significant personal detour that severed any connection to his volunteer duties, making his subsequent act of driving a gratuitous gesture rather than an act in furtherance of his employer's business.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the strict limitations of the 'scope of employment' test for vicarious liability, especially in the context of volunteers. It clarifies that social activities undertaken by volunteers after mandatory duties conclude are generally considered a 'frolic and detour,' severing the agency relationship for tort liability purposes. The ruling provides a degree of protection for non-profit and charitable organizations, preventing them from being held liable for the personal conduct of their volunteers during off-duty hours. This prevents the doctrine of respondeat superior from expanding into a form of strict liability for any action a volunteer takes during a work-related weekend.
