Allen v. Lockwood
2015 WL 590917, 156 So. 3d 650, 2015 La. LEXIS 221 (2015)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A defendant is entitled to summary judgment when they demonstrate an absence of factual support for an essential element of the plaintiff's claim, and the plaintiff subsequently fails to produce any evidence sufficient to show they could meet their burden of proof at trial. The question of whether a condition poses an unreasonable risk of harm, while fact-intensive, can be decided on summary judgment if there are no genuine issues of material fact.
Facts:
- Wesley Chapel United Methodist Church is located in a rural area and provides an unpaved, grassy area among trees for congregants to park their vehicles.
- Congregants had used this grassy area for parking for over fifty years without any prior accidents.
- Following church services, Hattie Lockwood, an elderly church member, entered her vehicle parked in the grassy area.
- Ms. Lockwood reversed her car at a high rate of speed, striking the plaintiff as she was walking through the parking area.
Procedural Posture:
- Plaintiff filed suit in the district court (trial court) against several defendants, including Wesley Chapel United Methodist Church and its insurer.
- The church defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing plaintiff could not establish negligence.
- The district court denied the church defendants' motion for summary judgment.
- The church defendants (applicants) applied for supervisory writs from the court of appeal.
- The court of appeal denied the application for supervisory writs.
- The church defendants (applicants) were granted a writ by the Louisiana Supreme Court to review the lower courts' rulings.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Is a defendant entitled to summary judgment in a premises liability case when the plaintiff fails to produce any factual evidence to support the essential claim that a condition on the defendant's property was unreasonably dangerous?
Opinions:
Majority - Per Curiam
Yes, a defendant is entitled to summary judgment when the plaintiff fails to produce evidence of an unreasonably dangerous condition. Once a defendant points out a lack of factual support for an essential element of the plaintiff's case, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to produce evidence demonstrating a genuine issue of material fact for trial. The court clarified that its prior holding in Broussard—which stated that the unreasonable risk of harm determination is for the fact-finder—does not preclude summary judgment. Broussard involved a full trial and was not intended to limit a court's ability to grant summary judgment when a plaintiff is unable to produce any factual support for their claim. In this case, the church defendants presented evidence that the parking area was not dangerous (long history of safe use, obvious condition), while the plaintiff failed to produce any evidence to the contrary and admitted in her deposition that she could not say what the church did wrong. Therefore, no genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether the parking area was unreasonably dangerous, and the defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Analysis:
This decision significantly clarifies Louisiana's summary judgment standard in premises liability cases, particularly after potential confusion from the Broussard decision. It reinforces that a plaintiff cannot survive summary judgment on mere allegations alone; they must present concrete evidence to support each essential element of their claim once challenged by the defendant. The ruling empowers trial courts to dismiss unsupported negligence claims pre-trial, promoting judicial efficiency and preventing parties from being forced into costly litigation based on speculative claims. It effectively balances the fact-finder's role in close cases with the court's gatekeeping function to dispose of cases where there is a complete failure of proof.
