Lexplug logoLexplug

Albury v. City of Jacksonville Beach

Supreme Court of Florida
295 So. 2d 297 (1974)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

When multiple, conflicting statutes are passed to form a single government charter and approved simultaneously by referendum, the last legislative act prevails in determining legislative intent. A consolidated government cannot levy a municipal-level tax on a constituent quasi-municipality if it would result in discriminatory double taxation compared to other areas.


Facts:

  • The municipalities of Jacksonville Beach, Atlantic Beach, Neptune Beach (the "Beaches"), and the Town of Baldwin were independent cities created by the Florida Legislature.
  • In 1967, the Legislature passed Chapter 67-1320, a law creating a single consolidated government for the City of Jacksonville and Duval County.
  • This initial act appeared to abolish the corporate structures of the Beaches and Baldwin, converting them into "urban services districts" with only powers delegated by the new consolidated government.
  • Just days later, the Legislature passed an amendatory act, Chapter 67-1535, which restored municipal powers to the Beaches and Baldwin.
  • A third amending act, Chapter 67-1547, was also passed.
  • Voters in Duval County approved all three acts together in a single referendum, making them the charter for the new consolidated government.
  • Following consolidation, the new government asserted its sole authority to levy both a county-wide occupational tax and a municipal-level occupational tax within the entire consolidated area, including in the Beaches and Baldwin.

Procedural Posture:

  • The Beaches and Baldwin (Plaintiffs) filed a complaint in a Florida trial court seeking a declaratory judgment on their status and authority to levy taxes.
  • The Consolidated Government of Jacksonville (Defendant) filed a counterclaim seeking a declaration affirming its own authority.
  • The trial court ruled in favor of the Consolidated Government, holding the Beaches and Baldwin were subordinate districts with no independent taxing authority.
  • The Beaches and Baldwin appealed to the Florida District Court of Appeal, First District.
  • The District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court, holding that the Beaches and Baldwin continued to exist as quasi-municipal corporations with the power to tax and receive funds.
  • H.S. Albury, representing the Consolidated Government, petitioned the Supreme Court of Florida for review of the appellate decision.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Do the former municipalities of Jacksonville Beach, Atlantic Beach, Neptune Beach, and Baldwin retain their independent authority to levy municipal occupational license taxes and receive government funds after the consolidation of Jacksonville and Duval County?


Opinions:

Majority - Justice Boyd

Yes, the former municipalities retain their authority as quasi-municipal corporations. When conflicting statutes are passed, the last expression of the Legislature prevails. Although the initial consolidation act (Chapter 67-1320) divested the smaller municipalities of their power, a subsequent amendatory act (Chapter 67-1535) restored it. Since all acts were approved together, the modifications became effective simultaneously, demonstrating the ultimate legislative and popular intent to preserve the powers of the Beaches and Baldwin. Therefore, these quasi-municipalities can levy their own occupational license taxes and receive state and federal funds. Furthermore, it would be unconstitutionally discriminatory for the consolidated government to levy a municipal tax on top of the quasi-municipality's tax and a county tax, as this would subject businesses in those areas to three taxes while others only pay two.


Concurring - Justice Roberts

Yes. Justice Roberts agreed with the majority's judgment, stating that the opinion of the District Court of Appeal was correct and should be adopted as the opinion of the Supreme Court.



Analysis:

This decision is significant for establishing the legal status and autonomy of smaller municipalities within a larger consolidated government structure. It affirms the 'last-in-time' rule of statutory construction, clarifying that even when a package of laws is approved simultaneously, a later-passed amendatory act will control over an earlier conflicting one. The ruling also sets a constitutional limit on the taxing power of consolidated governments, using a due process and equal protection rationale to prevent discriminatory, layered taxation schemes that would unfairly burden residents of constituent quasi-municipalities. This precedent ensures a degree of financial independence for such entities and influences how consolidated government charters are interpreted nationwide.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Albury v. City of Jacksonville Beach (1974) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for Albury v. City of Jacksonville Beach