Agnant v. Shakur
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19714, 1998 WL 886991, 30 F.Supp.2d 420 (1998)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under New York law, a statement falsely accusing an individual of being a police informant is not defamatory because it would not expose that individual to public contempt or ridicule in the minds of "right-thinking persons," who do not hold a negative opinion of those who cooperate with law enforcement.
Facts:
- In late 1993, rap artist Tupac Shakur and Jacques Agnant were arrested and indicted together for sexual assault.
- The criminal charges against Agnant were severed from those against Shakur.
- Shakur's case proceeded to trial in late 1994, resulting in a conviction.
- Several months after Shakur's conviction, Agnant pleaded guilty to lesser charges and was sentenced to probation.
- In December 1996, a posthumous album by Shakur was released, featuring the song "Against All Odds."
- The song's lyrics included the lines "a real live tale about a snitch named Haitian Jack" and "knew he was working for the fed."
- Agnant, who is of Haitian descent and was known in the community, alleged these lyrics referred to him and falsely claimed he acted as a federal informant against Shakur.
- Throughout this period, from late 1994 onwards, Agnant was continuously employed as an executive at a record company.
Procedural Posture:
- Jacques Agnant filed a libel lawsuit in the Supreme Court of New York County against the Estate of Tupac Shakur and various record companies.
- The defendants removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York based on diversity jurisdiction.
- The Record Company defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, or in the alternative, summary judgment.
- The Shakur Estate filed a motion for summary judgment.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does falsely accusing someone of being a police informant in a rap song constitute defamation as a matter of law in New York?
Opinions:
Majority - Mukasey, J.
No, falsely accusing someone of being a police informant does not constitute defamation as a matter of law. For a statement to be libelous, it must expose the plaintiff to contempt or ridicule in the minds of 'right-thinking persons.' The court reasoned that individuals who would think ill of someone for cooperating with law enforcement do not qualify as 'right-thinking persons.' The court's role is not to protect a reputation within a group whose standards are considered anti-social. Public policy supports this conclusion, as holding otherwise would impede law enforcement and penalize law-abiding conduct. The court also dismissed Agnant's other claims of defamation from the lyrics, finding they were not libelous per se because they required extrinsic facts to be understood, and Agnant failed to plead or prove special damages (specific economic loss), which is required in such cases.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies a significant public policy exception within defamation law, affirming that courts will not recognize damage to a reputation within an 'anti-social' community as legally actionable harm. It reinforces the 'right-thinking persons' standard as a critical threshold inquiry, effectively filtering out claims based on norms that conflict with public policy, such as the disapproval of cooperating with law enforcement. The case also serves as a strong reminder of the strict requirements for pleading and proving special damages when a statement is not defamatory on its face (libel per se), making it more difficult for plaintiffs to succeed on claims that require extrinsic context for their defamatory meaning.
