2nd Roc-Jersey Associates v. Town of Morristown
731 A.2d 1, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 545, 158 N.J. 581 (1999)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Assessments imposed by a municipal Special Improvement District (SID) that fund services and improvements demonstrably enhancing the value or function of commercial properties are considered special assessments, not real property taxes. Therefore, exempting residential properties from such assessments does not violate the New Jersey Constitution's Uniformity Clause.
Facts:
- The Town of Morristown enacted an ordinance creating a Special Improvement District (SID) to combat declining economic conditions.
- The SID was funded by a special assessment on properties within the district, calculated as a percentage of the property's assessed value for local real property tax purposes.
- The SID's stated purposes were to promote economic growth, encourage business self-help programs, and manage these programs through a District Management Corporation.
- The ordinance specifically exempted all properties used for residential purposes from the special assessment.
- Plaintiffs 2nd Roc-Jersey Associates and Shav Associates, owners of large commercial office buildings within the SID, were levied substantial assessments under the ordinance.
- Activities funded by the SID included advertising campaigns, street sweeping, encouraging tourism, providing hospitality guides, and business recruitment, which were primarily intended to benefit commercial properties.
Procedural Posture:
- Plaintiffs 2nd Roc-Jersey Associates and Shav Associates filed a complaint in the state trial court against the Town of Morristown and its District Management Corporation.
- The trial court ruled that Morristown's SID ordinances were valid and the exclusion of residential properties was permissible.
- Following a report ordered by the court, the trial court entered a final order ruling that Morristown's special assessment formula was both reasonable and legal.
- Plaintiffs, as appellants, appealed the trial court's rulings to the Appellate Division.
- The Appellate Division affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the plaintiffs' complaints.
- The New Jersey Supreme Court granted the plaintiffs' petitions for certification.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a special assessment imposed on commercial properties within a municipal Special Improvement District, which exempts residential properties, violate the New Jersey Constitution's Uniformity Clause by constituting a non-uniform real property tax?
Opinions:
Majority - Handler, J.
No. The special assessment imposed on commercial properties within the municipal Special Improvement District does not violate the New Jersey Constitution's Uniformity Clause because it is a valid special assessment, not a real property tax. The Uniformity Clause, which requires all real property taxes to be applied uniformly, is inapplicable to special assessments. The Court determined that the SID impositions are special assessments because they fund a combination of services and improvements specifically intended to benefit the subject commercial properties by demonstrably enhancing their value, use, or function. Unlike traditional special assessments for tangible public works like sewers, these benefits can be intangible services that supplement municipal functions. Because the benefits—such as advertising, business recruitment, and enhanced streetscapes—are aimed exclusively at improving the commercial district, there is a clear distinction justifying the exemption of residential properties, which do not receive the same direct, peculiar benefit. Furthermore, the method of calculating the assessment based on property tax value is a reasonable and practical means of apportioning costs in proportion to the benefits received, even if not mathematically precise.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the legal foundation for Special Improvement Districts (SIDs) in New Jersey, broadening the traditional definition of a 'special assessment.' By classifying SID charges for ongoing services and intangible benefits as special assessments rather than taxes, the Court grants municipalities significant flexibility to fund urban revitalization projects. This precedent allows local governments to target commercial areas for improvement and fund those efforts through assessments on the businesses that directly benefit, without being constrained by the constitutional requirement to tax all classes of property, including residential, uniformly. The ruling is crucial for economic development policy, affirming a key tool for combating urban decay and fostering local business growth.
Unlock the full brief for 2nd Roc-Jersey Associates v. Town of Morristown