2-4 Realty Associates v. Pittman
137 Misc. 2d 898, 1987 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2734, 523 N.Y.S.2d 7 (1987)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An individual not related to a deceased tenant by blood or marriage may qualify as a "family member" for succession rights to a rent-controlled apartment if they can demonstrate that their household was the functional and factual equivalent of a traditional family.
Facts:
- In 1961, Jimmie Hendrix began renting a room from Henry Pittman in a rent-controlled apartment.
- Over the next 25 years, Hendrix, his mother Annette Baxter, and Pittman developed a close, interdependent relationship.
- Around 1970, Pittman declared they would live as one family, and they began merging their finances and sharing all household expenses and responsibilities.
- After Pittman's health deteriorated in the mid-1970s, leading to the amputation of both legs, Hendrix became his full-time, primary caregiver.
- For the last eight years of Pittman's life, Hendrix provided constant and intensive care, including bathing and changing him.
- Pittman consistently referred to Hendrix as his 'son' or 'boy', and they shared a close emotional bond recognized by friends, neighbors, and their church community.
- Before his death, Pittman executed a power of attorney in Hendrix's favor to manage his financial affairs.
- Henry Pittman died in 1986, having lived with Hendrix in what they considered a family unit for over 15 years.
Procedural Posture:
- The landlord (petitioner) initiated a holdover proceeding in the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County, to evict Jimmie Hendrix and Annette Baxter (respondents) after the death of the tenant of record, Henry Pittman.
- The landlord alleged that the respondents were mere licensees whose right to occupy the apartment terminated upon Pittman's death.
- The respondents filed a motion to dismiss the petition.
- Respondents argued they were entitled to remain as members of the deceased tenant's family unit under New York City Rent and Eviction Regulations § 56 (d).
- The court directed a hearing to determine whether the respondents qualified as family members entitled to succession rights.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does an individual who is not related by blood or marriage to a deceased rent-controlled tenant, but who lived with and cared for the tenant in a long-term, committed, and interdependent relationship, qualify as a 'family member' entitled to succession rights under New York City's rent control regulations?
Opinions:
Majority - Schlesinger, J.
Yes, an individual in such a relationship qualifies as a family member for succession rights. The court found overwhelming and uncontested evidence that Hendrix, Baxter, and Pittman constituted a family unit based on the longevity of their relationship, their high level of mutual commitment and support, their self-definition as a family, and their shared history. Drawing an analogy to zoning cases like McMinn v. Town of Oyster Bay, the court held that to be constitutional and avoid violating due process, rent control regulations defining 'family' must extend to households that are the 'functional and factual equivalent of a natural family.' Restricting the regulation's protection solely to those related by blood or marriage would be irrational, especially where, as here, the relationship embodied the very devotion and mutual care the regulation was designed to protect and encourage.
Analysis:
This decision significantly broadened the legal definition of 'family' in the context of New York's rent control succession laws, moving beyond traditional definitions based on blood or marriage. It established a 'functional equivalent of a family' test, allowing courts to consider the actual emotional and financial realities of a household. This precedent was crucial for protecting non-traditional family structures from eviction and laid the groundwork for future cases involving unmarried partners, including same-sex couples, seeking succession rights based on the nature of their relationship rather than formal legal status.
